Anyways moving on to why I actually logged in to say what I wanted to say regarding this topic, which I would also like to further over exact my reasoning for explaining this, being that I didn't leave the forum, I would just read the different discussions, and have been feeling pushed or compelled to add something here, but this particular topic "ignited" me to actually lead in here as I could see that this seems like a passionate topic for many here even if it's not a primary passion (which I think is a good thing? Although I would say my brain morphs/unifies too many topics into one, where the reality is fractualization, meaning that as I see it, I see unions of any sort as sexual in nature and I also see them as not being that, as I don't perceive "sexuality" the same way).
So I can't remember when I read Barbara Marciniak's books or which one of the books it was, but I read her 4 main books (or haha the 4 main books in this portion of the infinite variations of Barbara Marciniak lol) and as I'm guessing some here may think or conclude about her... Just taking a guess as I cannot scan all of you here or even do a true scan, however that would work or don't matter here and now. And that guess being that she was not a true pleiadian contactee or whatever (there's a reason I got all these side notes as I'm anticipating energetic flows once this hits certain nodal points of thought/energy in here that I felt I accurately scanned, and therefore doing this to set the flows right so I don't get energetic backlashes headed my way, as I got enough as it is[and please don't take this as some sort of weird victimization leeching scheme, or just as bad you deify my processes/capacities]). Or it was something along the lines that it was old school pleiadian knowledge that she offered and doesn't hold a candle to the Taygetan Disclosure and as such shouldn't be considered at all or pointed/referenced to. Yet here we are talking about sexuality and I'm going assume that the predominant beings invested in this topic are what you would consider biologically male. And well Barbara Marciniak had something in her books just for you and of course I've got a little other information to add to it which ties into what is considered biologically female.
Sorry trying to get to the damn point lol (so many points, damn infinity!). So at the times of change or the seasonal ups and downs, as in parting away from one's romantic partner, Barbara (can't say for sure this is how she intended it exactly to be explained, but blah, I'm trying to illustrate that...) acknowledged that for all kinds of reasons that a male can be without a partner that is best in tune with them, but of course the male sexual energies being what they are especially in more genetically advanced sentient beings like humans, will cause a build up of sexual energy that needs to be released. Most males of course will masturbate which it seems like the f*cked up 3D medical science or cabal garbage, or whatever is behind them would suggest is normal and healthy. And yet if you cross-reference or build a bridge of connecting dots with what the Swaruuians (Or was it Anekka? I can't remember, [everything is so blurry!]) said that the female menstrual cycle is unnatural and due to various causes, the main one pointed at being the Lunar AI Sphere, is an act of genetic/loosh/biologics harvesting.
Now what I"m getting at here is that it's the same with males masturbating, it's a form of harvesting and vital energy loss, biological material or prana loss. So tying this in with what Barbara had to offer was insight into that males can keep those energies flowing as it was intended I suppose from a biological engineering standpoint by masturbating but at the point before orgasm, the male can push (you have to push hard in some cases depending on the hydraulics of ejaculation) on their perineum (spot between anus and testicles) and orgasm will still be experienced, but no loss or leakage of sperm! Also it may take some getting used to and of course I can't specify in certainty that all results are the same as each person harbors divergent genetic signatures. In this light I would say that it is the equivalent of a female using her mind to control her menstruation as an act of maintaining biologics/prana/energy.
Anyways hope this helps some, or whatever. I share this in good faith in efforts to raise consciousness, and this message is particularly aimed at males. I may or may not add further insight into this topic as I'm just blah, very very ill on so many levels and not in a good place. Greetings and farewell!
]]>So what is pleasure. It is positive sensual stimulation. It is generally connected with being happy. And we can be happy in many ways, not only with sensual and physical stimulation. When we are happy we are content/satisfied, it is the same. And it is a natural thing to be happy and content and to lean in such direction, to find things that makes us content.
For me sexual stimulation is giving very strong pleasure sense, like nothing else compared. But in the same time can be detrimental to the body-mind if I waste the sexual energy. And because is this intense and incomparable pleasurable experience, sexuality is so addictive and people fall in the trap of its dark passion known as lust.What is making sexuality in its place, balanced is when shared with someone we truly love and knowing the technics how to prolong the process without losing the energy.
Well, that's true. It's balanced when shared with someone we truly love, and in that case, the pleasure comes from a lot more than just physical stimulation.
]]>What is making sexuality in its place, balanced is when shared with someone we truly love and knowing the technics how to prolong the process without losing the energy.
]]>Divine and loving sexuality for the sake of pleasure and intimacy is different from pure physical lust that is detached from love and only satisfies the physical senses. That's why more advanced people and cultures have a natural tendency towards monogamy, because the flow of love and intimacy is strongest and best when it is between two people who love each other and not diluted and distorted with polyamory.
]]>And probably most Lyrian civilizations are monogamous but I don't know/remember, it could be common in some 5D Lyrian cultures. And I don't know about other branches like the Urmahs for example, I don't remember if it was mentioned in the Urmah videos, the dynamics could be different in different species. The Arcturians for example don't have genders and romantic relationships.
]]>My point on the previous post was that the whole sex thing is not designed for pleasure but for creating new life. And if you have many partners you will not know if the child is your or not. And for what do you want to have many partners, what is the purpose if you have one and you are mutually self sufficient?
]]>I dont know who yazhy father is and I don't believe she has one. Going off what I know from cosmic agency video on YouTube. What I know is that her mother gave birth to her whilst in hyper space. Which led to her powerful abilities. There is a video on gosias page detailing the experiences of the swarus and there history which I recommend you watch to gain a better perspective on the matter.
]]>Intimacy is something sacred for all highly evolved humans like Taygeta. It is something between two people, man and woman. It is love relationship, real love, when people are close and similar in mind and attracted to each other.
I agree 100%.
]]>In astral plane of Earth there are no Taygetans but there are many who present themselves like Pleiadians. They are not real Pleiadians but impostors and deceivers of all kind. So it is wise not to trust info received from the astral. Debauchery is not part of any spiritual and highly moral society. In astral and here in 3D they try to make it normal. Debauchery is a form of corruption of the soul.
This sounds more likely. While I'm sure that the Taygetans could connect with starseeds in the astral if they wanted, the chances are at least as likely that such an experience would be deception and manipulation by impostor beings. The group sex thing really seems to conflict with the official disclosure's information about Taygetan relationships. They didn't outright say it, as far as I know, but the context is there that they don't find any value in having multiple partners.
To me, it's just common sense and good ethics that sexual energy transfer and romantic interest should be between two devoted partners, and having anyone else in the mix diminishes and distorts this energy and messes up the whole flow and circuitry, making it something wasteful, draining, and corrupted.
]]>