You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
#1 Re: English Forum » The Nirvana Dilemma: Why do we yearn to return to the Source if.... » 2024-02-24 16:26:15
The key question that is necessary to get out of any Matrix (D= 1,2,3 4, 5, 6, 7,8 etc. ad infinitum) is the following:
How do I, who am already the Source?
The answer is never intellectual, because the answer is implicit in the question itself.
Hint: the output is the same input: ..... What is the output that is the same input?
If you solve this riddle you will get out of ALL the Matrix.
#2 English Forum » The Nirvana Dilemma: Why do we yearn to return to the Source if.... » 2024-02-24 11:59:14
- CHARCOtranquilo
- Replies: 18
The Nirvana Dilemma: Why do we yearn to return to the Source if we are immersed in a cosmic circus of apparent fun?
Someone asked me this very interesting question that many very few awakened people have asked themselves at least once in their lives.
"If "I" have escaped from the state of nirvana (Source) to create this whole cosmic circus due to utter boredom, then why am "I" so eager to go back there again and leave the "fun" here forever?"
And this is the answer:
Interesting question.
But, you start from 3 false premises.
1. That you have escaped from "nirvana"(Source).
2. That "nirvana"(Source) is boring.
3. If you are eager to return to "nirvana"(Source) that means that :
a) Nirvana (Source) must not be boring.
b) And that this world is not fun.
-Therefore, the logical equation is incorrectly stated.
The correct premise of the logical variables for the equation is:
1. You have never wanted to escape from "nirvana" (Source). Because you have never abandoned Nirvana (Source)
2. If you have never wanted to escape "nirvana" (Source), it is because it is "fun".
3. The reason you are anxious to go back there and leave the "fun" here forever" is because this fun is an entertaining place where you can never have fun".
In other words. This hell is a beautiful and fun place where you can never be happy. Because if hell was a terrible place you would want to leave it immediately. And this is the strategy that "the devil" (ego) uses to delay your return home.
#3 Re: English Forum » How to manifest!? » 2024-01-07 13:21:00
PS: Moreover, only a misguided mind like that of the ego can imagine the SOURCE as a bland and nihilistic state where there is nothing, and in this idea of nothing, that is, no stimulus, the ego incorrectly grounds and projects that the SOURCE is somewhat like a boring place due to the lack of stimuli. What the ego does not understand and will NEVER understand is that the SOURCE does not need to project any stimulus to BE UNCONDITIONAL, ETERNAL FULLNESS. And in this UNDERSTANDING, there is no room for any boredom.
#4 Re: English Forum » How to manifest!? » 2024-01-07 13:05:17
Brahman wrote:The Source is everything so it's rather very unboring. Lol
The limitations are boring - physical, mental, galactic... But the Source is unlimited by nothing. If we think this way we too will be unlimited.Source fragments herself into us, because she is bored in the Oneness ... but she LOVES to put humpty-dumpty back together again.
Fragmentation in this life-wave has led to so much hostility that we find ourselves wishing to somewhat re-unite in peace ... so we are heading in the direction of Source.
But we never reach Source. Because Source contains no time. Therefore, if you entered Source, you would get stuck there. Nothing can change without time.From another perspective, we are Source right now. All this fighting ~ everything IS Source.
Consciousness is contrast. Nothing can exist without polarity. {I love the yin-yang symbol.}
To think that you need to go somewhere or do something to "ascend" into Source is matrix-think. We expand & contract eternally in Source. That's how "Source" exists.
Believing that the SOURCE is "bored" is a conceptual and ontological error. This idea can only arise from a mind that is bored, and this bored mind is the ego. This fact does not occur in the SOURCE. Precisely, the ego gets bored because the same limitation and conditioning are the cause of its boredom. In other words, the ego lives in a constant loop of repeating its own limitations; the same limitation (cognitive conditioning) condemns it to a sterile repetition of its own limitations persistently, and these end up becoming predictable, thus expressing its existence insubstantially nihilistic and boring, unable to go beyond its limitations. So when the ego says that the SOURCE is bored, it is merely projecting its own cognitive deficiencies of understanding. Moreover, it is a way of attempting to anthropomorphize the SOURCE, driven by the impossibility of truly UNDERSTANDING what the SOURCE really is. Since the source is beyond any idea that the ego can conceptualize, intellectualize, fantasize, imagine, or suppose, and infer, etc., because the SOURCE is beyond the ego; the SOURCE knows nothing about the ego, and furthermore, it knows nothing about any world imagined by the ego. Because the ego, per se, cannot create anything ETERNAL, and in this limitation, its boredom is generated.
#5 Re: English Forum » Do you know this symbol? » 2023-12-14 01:20:22
HOW TO COME OUT OF THE EXPERIENCE OF SLEEP PARALYSIS OR CATALEPSY
What does sleep paralysis, also known as catalepsy, have to do with astral travel or the out-of-body experience? Well, the relationship is quite direct.
Catalepsy, or sleep paralysis, is the sensation that a person has when they are normally in bed, lying still, unable to breathe and unable to speak. The sensation, when this happens, is intense, and if the person does not know what is happening, it is not very pleasant to say the least.
Why is this directly related to out-of-body experiences or astral travel? When a person is in catalepsy, they are already in an out-of-body experience or astral travel. We have been taught from an early age to attend only to the physical part of ourselves. The reference we have of ourselves is that what we are is the physical part, regardless of the fact that intellectually we can conceive the idea that there are other parts, such as the energetic part. But we have it built in that what we are is the physical part.
When a person is in catalepsy or sleep paralysis, they are in an out-of-body experience or astral travel. What is the reason why the person cannot move, breathe or speak? It is simply because that person is trying to do so from the physical part, when they are no longer in the physical part, but yet their brain is trying to move from this physical part to get out of the experience just as it would when it initiates the command from their mind to move the physical body when they awaken from the dream sleep.
How do we get out of this experience of sleep paralysis?
It is simple: we have two ways out:
1.- we can either continue with the astral travel experience or exit into the physical part. In other words, to get out of this state of catalepsy, we can act from our energetic body. The orders to get up, as if you were getting out of bed by projecting yourself, are given from the lower energetic nucleus which is situated four fingers below the navel, which is the centre that regulates the brain of our energetic body. If we move the movement commands to that area, all we have to do is get up from there, and the sleep paralysis will end. This confirms that catalepsy is an out-of-body experience, and all that was happening is that you were trying to give commands from a physical part that you are no longer in.
2. If there is not enough power or energy from the energy body to generate the out-of-body experience or astral travel, and the person simply wants to come out of that state, they can move the last phalanx of the little finger of the right hand and focus the attention there. By doing so, he will automatically come out of the state of catalepsy or sleep paralysis and regain mobility and speech from the physical part. This happens because the last phalanx of the little finger is a link between the physical part and the energetic part.
#6 Re: English Forum » Mahasamadhi, the conscious passing away. (Ref. today's Mari's video) » 2023-11-28 01:41:22
One cannot come directly to maha samadhi without first passing through nirvikalpa samadhi while alive. Nirvikalpa samadhi is when the mind is immersed in the oceanic timeless silence (we are not speaking here of the kind of conceptual silence that is established from the contrast between the presence of sound or its absence, or the presence of thought or its absence: this silence still emerges from the duality or pluri-polarisation of the mind) that does not emerge from any sound or its absence or from any thought or its presence. Nor is this Silence the result of trying to drown out thoughts by some meditative exercise such as a mantra or the attempt to force oneself to "not think" by eliminating by silencing any thoughts as they arise. These methods are unproductive and generate the rebound effect (thoughts appear with more force as when we open a water dam) when the meditation is over. This Silence does not arise from any effort, and permanently because one IS Silence itself. One knows how to BE Silence without needing to think about BEING silence. This is the nature of the SOURCE a-conceptual potential Silence. This is nirvikalpa samadhi. If this SILENCE is not attained in life, here and now, maha samadhi will not occur because this is the result of nirvikalpa samadhi.
Therefore, the difference between maha samadhi and nirvikalpa samadhi is that the former is a state of consciousness that involves leaving the physical body and entering into the Absolute Reality or Source on a permanent basis, while the latter is a state of consciousness that involves the actualised and vivid realisation that one is Silence itself which entails merging with the absolute reality on a temporary basis while alive or what is usually called enlightenment.
#7 Re: English Forum » Undressing the Illusion of Mystical Experiences » 2023-10-29 18:31:55
@Celestial Marriage:
First of all, I thank you for your answer, something I did not expect since I presupposed that it would be deserted of any answer since it is directed and written to a person in exclusivity and that "because of his level of expansion of consciousness and intellectual depth", only that person can give "THE ANSWER" in all its dimension both cognitive and outside the realm of cognition or the cognizable.
In fact his (this person's) NON-response to this post is what is expected because it is set within a larger code whose comprehension is within the framework of the invisible to perception.
However, the content of his anecdotal unexpected response shows that the post has been written and designed with sufficient erudition and difficulty to reveal that his level of his response is in accordance with what is expected. This confirms to me the success of your wording, since only your recipient can encode it.
Thank you.
#8 English Forum » Undressing the Illusion of Mystical Experiences » 2023-10-29 00:37:07
- CHARCOtranquilo
- Replies: 2
We enter the abstruse realm of mystical experiences and illusion. The question that presents itself before us is: Do mystical experiences possess an aspect of authenticity? When we try to answer this question, in many occasions, the very course we adopt in our thinking implies the solution.
Can we go deeper into this question with the appropriate distance, can we really approach this question without prejudice and contemplate it in its fullness, can we really look at it in its entirety? For example, if our predisposition and tendency point towards the search for the spiritual, are we not, in that act, preconditioning ourselves to explore all possibilities?
Can we face this question by leaving aside the fragmentation that our ego generates? These questions are in no way related to the intrinsic nobility of mystical experiences; it is important to stress this point, for by giving them such a connotation, we introduce an element of division that prevents us from contemplating the problem in its totality. However, do we really know what constitutes an experience? Moreover, who is the subject that experiences? A great majority within the "spiritual realm" conceive the mystical experience as something sublime, coming from unconventional spheres, which allows them to transcend the routine circumstances of their daily lives.
However, is it possible to experience without the intervention of the experiencer? The answer to this question lies in negation; the mystical experience does not emerge independently of the experiencer, the observer. It is always permeated and conditioned by the memories and, ultimately, the history of the individual who is observing it. Just as a fluid conforms to its container, the mystical experience takes the form of the experiencer. His or her expectations, desires, emotional baggage and mental projections shape the mystical experience; indeed, it is these elements that generate and experience it, based on the legacy of the past.
The experiencer identifies with the experience itself. Therefore, for this phenomenon to materialize, the observer of the mystical experience must recognize it. Otherwise, he can only ascertain its existence by assimilating it and identifying it with the facets of his ego, that is, through his past experiences. Otherwise, the experiencer would not be able to speak of a mystical experience, simply because he would not be able to recognize it. The mystical experience is an exclusive and intrinsic event to the person who lives it.
The individual feels and lives the mystical experience as something extraordinary, but always within the scope of his psychological and mental structure. Depending on the beliefs of each individual, the mystical experience will assume different forms. For a Christian, for example, it could take on the appearance of a cross, which would be consistent with his or her personal history. On the other hand, for someone interested in esotericism and related topics of spirituality, the protagonists of the mystical experience could be beings of light with a revelation of unknowable knowledge and so on. Generally speaking, the act of experiencing a profound, sometimes singular, mystical experience leads the individual experiencing it to feel important and even to desire to possess the mystical experiences of others, either because of their revelatory depth, their pleasurable staging or their cathartic nature.
However, we are faced with the paradox that with mystical experience, we trade and traffic as if it were an interchangeable commodity, just as we do with other people's possessions, such as vehicles, homes or finances. In reality, it is worth asking ourselves: What do we seek in a mystical experience? Perhaps we seek to escape from the loneliness and monotony of daily life in order to approach a permanent orgasmic hedonism? In any case, it is not possible to affirm with certainty if the mystical experience is real if we do not understand in its totality what reality itself is. What we can say with certainty is that the constant movement of our mind, even in its subtlest aspects, constitutes a succession of projections that prevent us from experiencing the present. These ephemeral thoughts slip between the fingers of the past and the future, and are tinged with our memories, but they have no real existence.
Our self prevents us from perceiving concrete reality, filtering it and creating a world of shadows and symbols. Everything we are, everything we see and feel exists in our subjective consciousness and disappears along with it. So how can we discern whether a mystical experience is real in itself, or at least has the potential to be?
Ultimately, the hope that the mystical experience will come to our aid and rescue us from our personal suffering is just another illusion, and longing for it prevents us from living in the present and plunges us into a world of mirages and projections. True greatness lies in being fully present in the moment. The feverish search for a mystical revelatory experience is fallacious; it is self-deception. Moreover, when this goal is not achieved, it only generates frustration and drives us to seek more. When it is achieved, the only thing we achieve is to exacerbate our ego. So, the question arises: How many mystical experiences are necessary to bring about a real change? Ten, twenty, fifty? It is relevant to reflect on the importance we attach to our identity as mystical experiencers, since this only deepens the gap that separates us from true reality.
When the experiencer fades away, he or she merges with the experience in an eternal present. At that moment, we no longer seek mystical experiences; we immerse ourselves in the very experience of the timeless, in the intrinsic reality of the present, and our life becomes naturalized in a simple everydayness exempt from any exacerbation of personal importance.
For this reason, we go deeper and deeper into the phenomenon of time, in order to be fully conscious in the present, observing not the consecutive flow of thought but the genesis of the timeless nothingness from which thought arises and, at the same time, freeing ourselves from time itself. Thus, we can observe ourselves from the same vision of the timeless consciousness that illuminates everything, with little effort. In this state, the experiencer, as an autonomous entity, disappears; both he and the thing observed cease to exist. This is because thought is intrinsically linked to time and, therefore, it is impossible for it to comprehend that which escapes the spatio-temporal framework.
Nevertheless, the renunciation of the pursuit of illusions can be arduous; it is inherent in human nature. However, to stop in the present and merge with the authentic reality, which transcends the world of shadows, is equally human. Psychological disintegration manifests as a constant and dynamic reinvention in the present. In reality, we do not perceive things as they are; we perceive them according to our own "I"; that is, as we have invented ourselves in an idealized and twisted "I".
Persistence in the interpretation of the mystical experience, on which we project our assumptions and noble values, only leads to the fragmentation of the very essence of the original moment. For example, this would be tantamount to trying to place the Big Bang in time, i.e., how could we establish a date for an event when time did not yet exist? It is, in essence, pedantic; how could we place it in space if space did not exist either? It is simply pretentious, as well as absurd. Nevertheless, most people accept this pattern and adopt it without difficulty without questioning its obvious physical, astrophysical and ontological incongruity.
In this context, it is appropriate to recall the phrase of St. Francis of Assisi: "What we are looking for is what you are looking at". By being aware of this and living the mystical experience in the present, we can reach the authentic transmutation, in the instant in which change disappears and we emerge from the cavern, in which we only perceived shadows.
As many thinkers have pointed out, from Kant to Krishnamurti to Bohm, it is impossible to experience the supreme through thought. The ability to name removes the individual from the thing itself and traps him in the confines of the mind, in the realms of space, time and causality, among other things.
In conclusion, it could be considered that the human being observes the world through contact lenses that, although indispensable for perception, distort the information. Depending on where we direct our gaze, we perceive reality with different nuances. As a result, we constantly observe reality in a distorted way, without ever reaching the ultimate essence of things.
#9 Re: English Forum » Buddha and enlightenment » 2023-10-11 21:53:06
The Federation/cabal do not make this matrix for spiritual development. This is a lie and all these personalities like Buddha have confirmed it.
Thanks, Yazhi
Yes, this is the great ontological-spiritual fallacy of this supposed "Federation".
To think that a series of extraterrestrials know your soulic evolutionary spiritual needs is a distorted ontological overestimation of a reality that is beyond the reach of their own comprehension. For the soul reality is the part of you that can only be known exclusively to you. Do not be fooled by outside agents, nor extraterrestrials who claim to know your soul's needs, for if they claim to know your soul's needs, it is because they do not know your soul's needs. For if they were truly knowledgeable of their soul's reality they would not assume such an arrogant role of control or implementation of suffering upon other souls. The only spiritual reality that knows your soul's needs is that part of you that has never lost connection with the SOURCE and ultimately the SOURCE ITSELF. Remember they, these extraterrestrials, also live separate from the SOURCE and their own soul needs. So how could they know the true needs of yours?
The only way to know the needs of your soul is to separate truth from ignorance. Naturally you isolate yourself and suffer. Seemingly disconnected from the SOURCE, you now have no security. You take a form and shelter and try to protect yourself from a world that disturbs and frightens you and it is this fear and uncertainty that they use to disavow that you have control over your soul's needs. For they know that any state of isolation, separation, and incarnation carries with it the germ of guilt and fear and they use it appropriately to their interests which only arise from their own ignorance of their soul's needs.
Remember that you cannot know the SOURCE with the intellect as those who claim to have knowledge or authority over your soul. The intellect was not created to encompass something as great as the SOURCE because intellect can only consider other intellects so when they say they know the needs of your soul they only do so from the same level of the intellect which can neither know the soul nor encompass the SOURCE. Remember that they are in the same condition of separation as you, in the same condition of uncertainty as you, in the same level of fear as you.
It is nonsense for them to pretend to modulate and correct your soul experience when they cannot amend the separation because the SOURCE did not create the separation, because the separation ontologically NEVER occurred. Therefore, it is a spiritual scam for them to make you believe that they can offer you life experiences in order to amend and correct your separation because it only fosters the idea that the separation occurred and invalidates you from assuming your true SPIRITUAL REALITY. The SOURCE, affects only reality, not that which is not reality. Therefore, those who pretend to assume control over your soul that is not theirs are not only not helping you spiritually, but the reality is that they are not helping themselves spiritually either because the reality is that they have no control over anything.
Do not let foreign agents from wherever they come tell you how you have to live the experience of your own soul or what you need to evolve spiritually. Do not be fooled by a supposed superiority or spiritual authority that in reality they or anyone else does not have. Your soul may feel lost but it cannot be completely lost because it is anchored to the SOURCE through a deeper KNOWLEDGE that does not come from the intellect. This KNOWLEDGE, which "travels with you at all times," which is with you at all times, which is in the invisible and indivisible NOW, is the TRUE guide that will never leave you in insidious uncertainty or cornered by fear or seek to dominate or control you because it comes from the TRUE SPIRITUAL FREEDOM THAT IS THE SOURCE.
Remember this: No one, no extraterrestrial wherever they come from is above the SOURCE, because they DO NOT HAVE CONTROL OF THE SOURCE, NOR CONTROL OF THEIR SOUL, BECAUSE THEY DID NOT CREATE THE SOURCE NOR DID THEY CREATE THEIR SOUL AND NO ONE HAS.
#10 Re: English Forum » Karma - by Mari Swaruu » 2023-10-08 21:51:10
"I opened the door and your presence entered like a sword without asking"
Is that yours? Or did you borrow it? I'm assuming they didn't take their shoes off before entering?
I have the ability to Guage people by feeling out their aura, when I pay attention to it, it works out better for me. Is it like someone enters a room and all of a sudden there is tension. The person sucked the life out of the room.
Or is there a deeper meaning? I'm curious
Its meaning is deeper, yes.
These words represent, a literal and figurative metaphor, when there occurs, in an instant without instant, the unexpected, surprising epiphany of the unalterable and invisible crystalline presence, beyond the intellective mind, which is subsumed and oceanified in, from, by and for itself and what remains is that sharp discernment that like a sword pierces the dense but at the same time fragile walls of illusion that until that moment were believed to be real and impregnable, turning into rubble and freeing the mind from its jailer, leaving only the open sky in a subtle and eloquent silence that floods with freedom every simple act of life itself.
Everything has been fulfilled.
#11 Re: English Forum » Karma - by Mari Swaruu » 2023-10-08 20:06:29
CHARCOtranquilo wrote:Scott Summers wrote:CHARCOtranquilo
There is no error in Mari’s video. The only glaring error is your lack of familiarity with this disclosure.
The subject of Karma has been dealt with extensively by Swaruu of Erra and Sophie. Mari’s take on Karma is an expansion and is consistent with Swaruu and Sophie’s take.
Lastly, they are advanced beings. Before you take it upon yourself to point out their “errors”, you would do well to perform your own research first. Just a thought, no offence.
Thank you for your opinion.
Although I do not like to offer references (with which I do not identify myself at all because they do not define me) just on this occasion and to put you in context in order to clarify this discrepancy I comment you:
I know of the existence of the Taygetans and of Swaruu and Sophia and their "disclosure" through the Interstellar Mediator, long before Robert and Gosia decided to make it public on their YoyTube channels. I have had direct contact in a conversation facilitated by the Interstellar Mediator with a male member of the former Taygetean crew (in which we talked about the topics of death, Karma and enlightenment) and that I will not expose his name because he expressly requested to keep his anonymity. Something that I will continue to maintain out of respect for his request regardless of any circumstances.
My disagreement with Mari does not arise from a lack of knowledge on this subject of Karma, on the contrary, it is based on the direct understanding of the scope of this metaphysical concept beyond the limiting intellectual approaches of a theoretical metaphysics and in the great majority of occasions misinterpreted because such knowledge is based on the interpretation that the ego makes and needs to perpetuate to try to postpone its inevitable disappearance.
Finally, there is no such thing as "advanced or less advanced beings"; it is like the densities are only categorizations made by the mind of the spiritualized ego that fall into exclusivism and narcissistic specialisms that are not in accordance with the scope of their definition and the true nature of our spiritual reality beyond the concepts and words that try to define what is inaccessible to the mind, be it human or extraterrestrial. And It is for this reason that the only fidelity and loyalty I severely guard is only to that ineffability that sustains me regardless of whether I exist or do not exist, whether non-terrestrial or terrestrial, since these categorizations are irrelevant to the SOURCE for the simple reason that it is not operative and does not define us at all in its ETERNAL AND OCEAN REALITY.
Kind regards.
Thank you for your reply.
You say there is no such thing as “advanced or less advanced beings”. These are categorisations made by the mind of the spiritualised ego.
Hmm. Your earlier posts seem to contradict what you claim above. It seems like you’re being disingenuous.
But nevermind, be sure to do your homework nextime.
Cheers!
CHARCOtranquilo
Your comment shows honesty, and that honours you, as you acknowledge where you are and not where others claim to be when they are NOT there; In them, it's just a cacophonic repetition of Yazhinian words borrowed in their minds from that which they have not yet achieved. A desire fueled by sterile logic that cannot bear fruit because words and concepts, if not planted in the fertile soil of experience and watered and fertilised with deep Understanding, which is freed from all logic, will become nothing but crutches for an invalid who wishes to run when all they can do is stumble with them at every step they take. Logic and the concepts that feed it may be a useful tool for someone who needs crutches because their mind is held hostage by their own mind, but logic will be a burden for someone who can already run and has light feet, and a heavy ballast for someone who has wings and can fly.
Okay, "let's do our homework" ...
There are no more advanced or less advanced beings, because from the SOURCE, there can be no divisions of levels of understanding as this goes against its own integrative nature. What can be understood by KNOWLEDGE in and from the SOURCE does not derive from the idea of levels because OMNISCIENT CONSCIOUSNESS in its expression is a pure abstraction in absolute absence of contents. That is, in an absolute absence of "thinking". The SOURCE, as such, "operates" beyond time and space and especially outside the intellective cognitive mind, (which is time) which, however, understands knowledge as a division that is concretized in intellective or conceptual contents (what we vulgarly call "thinking" or "ideas") which can only be differentiated by excluding and opposing each other in a relativity of apparent levels of knowledge which we call "levels of understanding" (with lower case). But all these so-called "levels of understanding" or divisions and subdivisions of knowledge into infinite fragments of thought, are not only merely rhetorical and semantic, but, and this is the most relevant, they are illusory.
As a Great Master named Ramana Maharshi said: "Uneducation is ignorance, but culture and knowledge in the world of illusions is educated ignorance".
It is for this reason that even though we can understand that there are more advanced beings that "SEEM to have a higher or more expanded level of consciousness" (erroneous concept because there is no such expansion of consciousness because consciousness neither expands nor contracts, it just IS) we are all in this soup of apparent levels in the most absolute ignorance no matter how expanded we think we are.
And no, don't worry, I declare myself rhetorically, semantically and literally absolutely ignorant of all this apparent knowledge that we have instrumentalized with the yoke of "I" thinking. Even what I have just stated only arises from the most absolute ignorance of this very illusion we call the "universe" of perceived knowledge.
Best regards.
#12 Re: English Forum » Karma - by Mari Swaruu » 2023-10-08 17:54:29
CHARCOtranquilo
There is no error in Mari’s video. The only glaring error is your lack of familiarity with this disclosure.
The subject of Karma has been dealt with extensively by Swaruu of Erra and Sophie. Mari’s take on Karma is an expansion and is consistent with Swaruu and Sophie’s take.
Lastly, they are advanced beings. Before you take it upon yourself to point out their “errors”, you would do well to perform your own research first. Just a thought, no offence.
Thank you for your opinion. 
Although I do not like to offer references (with which I do not identify myself at all because they do not define me) just on this occasion and to put you in context in order to clarify this discrepancy I comment you:
I know of the existence of the Taygetans and of Swaruu and Sophia and their "disclosure" through the Interstellar Mediator, long before Robert and Gosia decided to make it public on their YoyTube channels. I have had direct contact in a conversation facilitated by the Interstellar Mediator with a male member of the former Taygetean crew (in which we talked about the topics of death, Karma and enlightenment) and that I will not expose his name because he expressly requested to keep his anonymity. Something that I will continue to maintain out of respect for his request regardless of any circumstances.
My disagreement with Mari does not arise from a lack of knowledge on this subject of Karma, on the contrary, it is based on the direct understanding of the scope of this metaphysical concept beyond the limiting intellectual approaches of a theoretical metaphysics and in the great majority of occasions misinterpreted because such knowledge is based on the interpretation that the ego makes and needs to perpetuate to try to postpone its inevitable disappearance.
Finally, there is no such thing as "advanced or less advanced beings"; it is like the densities are only categorizations made by the mind of the spiritualized ego that fall into exclusivism and narcissistic specialisms that are not in accordance with the scope of their definition and the true nature of our spiritual reality beyond the concepts and words that try to define what is inaccessible to the mind, be it human or extraterrestrial. And It is for this reason that the only fidelity and loyalty I severely guard is only to that ineffability that sustains me regardless of whether I exist or do not exist, whether non-terrestrial or terrestrial, since these categorizations are irrelevant to the SOURCE for the simple reason that it is not operative and does not define us at all in its ETERNAL AND OCEAN REALITY.
Kind regards.
#13 Re: English Forum » Karma - by Mari Swaruu » 2023-10-08 12:17:44
Let's see, dear Mari, if there's no need to avoid karma in order to avoid accumulating incorrect actions and thus having to reincarnate again, and of course, also not accumulate karma by using error as a means of learning, that is, in an accumulation of an infinity of learning experiences to accumulate wisdom and thus avoid reincarnation. Both proposals are simply a forward escape from the so-called wheel of samsara or reincarnation.
The idea of the need for an infinite correction of errors that leads to an infinite learning process that will prevent the infinite wheel of samsara or reincarnation is a fallacy of spiritual progression that will NEVER result in true liberation from karma. On the contrary, it's a dead-end in the hamster-wheel samsara. Because karma is only an idea. And this idea arises from the same idea of separation from the SOURCE. This is THE ONLY ERROR that needs to be corrected. It's as simple as the hamster getting off the wheel to realize that it has NEVER taken him anywhere. In other words, translating the analogy, it's realizing that no action can free you from karma because the very action of freeing yourself from karma stems from the same mistaken idea of karma. In other words, karma cannot free itself from its own idea of karma because it arises from the same error of the idea that the separation from the SOURCE actually occurred, and this envelops you in a poisoned infinite loop of sterile actions of errors and successes that will feed other errors and successes and will only lead you to permanent frustration.
The liberation from karma and the wheel of samsara is so, so simple, that it's so obvious that everyone overlooks it. And it only consists of realizing the following proposition: What mistake did the SOURCE make if there was never any separation? None. And if there was never any mistake, the idea of karma is only an invention of yours, that is, an illusion, another spiritual fantasy that your ego feeds on and uses to keep you in a permanent state of guilt, suffering, and punishment.
#14 Re: English Forum » ENLIGHTENMENT: UNATTAINABLE OR PROGRESSIVE OR INSTANTANEOUS? » 2023-09-12 16:39:18
Everyone want only one thing, to be free (...) .
No, not everyone wants to be free. In fact the vast majority who follow this disclosure (99.99999999999999% ) only want freedom as a form of escape to avoid the biggest and most important of the commitments made: TO BE FREE FROM THE NEED TO BE FREE.
And when does one free oneself from the need to be free? When one understands that the condemnation, the prisoner, the jailer and the prison is YOU. And that this "you" is an illusion built in your mind.
What do I mean by this? That you constantly commit an error of perception that consists in having inverted the perception; looking from outside to inside as if what you see "out there" were the dream of another who is dreaming you, and who can wake up from a dream if you believe that you are not the dreamer? And this basic error that is your main postulate in your chaotic life is what keeps you in your prison.
What is this basic error of perception? That the Federation, the cabal, and all the enemies that you have created in your mind, (which are not, but another of your many points of attention) are NOT your jailers, THEY ARE YOUR PRISONERS and therefore is not the jailer imprisoned by the prisoner? So, free your prisoners from your mind and you will free yourself from your jailer, that is, from yourself and from the solid but illusory walls of your prison that you have so zealously built together with the amalgam and insubstantial cement of your thoughts
And... What was your own condemnation? In that every eye, in every, body, in every shadow that you would cast your vision you would be dissociated, alienated from yourself. And... How did you acquire it and perpetuate it? By seeing the other as alien to you, alienated from you, in this division you made of your mind, you catalogued him/her as your enemy, thinking that in this way you would protect yourself from his/her attack, which is none other than your own. But every attack needs a defense and the defense you built in your mind was an infinite wall that is now the same wall that keeps you imprisoned. Now you think you are safe and protected from your enemy, the one you have considered as the evil that tries to destroy you and you are the innocent and good victim that you try to destroy him to protect yourself without realizing that both are you. Thus, "good" and "evil" is only an appellation, a convenient euphemism to exculpate yourself and not to assume or take responsibility for your own alienation.
Free it from your hatred and you will free yourself from yourself!
When you understand that this wall is you who raised it to infinity believing yourself protected when in reality it was an attack against yourself by fragmenting your mind into infinite walls that are nothing more than your other points of attention, you will free yourself from this overload that you imposed on yourself.
#15 English Forum » ENLIGHTENMENT: UNATTAINABLE OR PROGRESSIVE OR INSTANTANEOUS? » 2023-09-11 00:08:11
- CHARCOtranquilo
- Replies: 6
Enlightenment: An "Unattainable State" or a Progressive and Infinite Spiritual Process or an Instantaneous, Total and Absolute Realization.
The short answer to this disjunctive would be that the three propositions are false because they all come from an interpretation that the "ego" makes about enlightenment. And even this answer would also be false because it is being made from another interpretation of the "ego" about the falsity of these three propositions about enlightenment.
And now in order to harmonize this discordant and puzzling answer we have to understand from what level of understanding ("expansion") (an inadequate word because it leads to confusion, since it denotes and connotes the idea that there are densities, levels, and processes in time) of consciousness is being made.
Enlightenment an Unattainable and Unrealizable State
To say that enlightenment is an unattainable and unrealizable "state" arises from the "ego's" implicit consideration that there is an attainable and realizable state of enlightenment. But from the level of the "SOURCE" enlightenment is neither unattainable nor unrealizable, nor is it realizable and attainable because the "SOURCE" has never been separated from Itself. has never separated from Itself. Which means that if there is no separation there is also nothing to achieve and unify. The idea of Unification can only arise from a concept of fragmentation, limitation, and separation and only the "ego" can achieve the illusory and unattainable feat of "believing it is enlightened" as well as the illusory impossibility that enlightenment is an unattainable and unrealizable state. Both possibilities are inherently interdependent in their own falsity, per se.
Enlightenment Seen as a Progressive and Infinite Process
The other false concept arises from movements associated with personal and "spiritual" growth as a continuous journey that unfolds as the individual "expands their consciousness" through experiences of both a psychological type such as growth and refinement of the personality and so-called "spiritual" type experiences that are associated with experiences where they may glimpse or experience expansive states of consciousness where there is a revelation and understanding of other "spiritual realities" ("densities") that sometimes generates a transformative effect in form, personal ways, beliefs, attitudes of approaching the daily life of the different vicissitudes of life. This understood within the framework of what we would call this 3D density. But this spiritual evolutionism does not end with death. That is to say, after disincarnation it would continue its progression in the "so-called world of the spirit where it would continue to develop and polish the personality in the different stages established as densities both higher and lower in an endless endless cycle of "purification and perfecting learning considering such process of spiritual perfection as a purification within a so-called progressive-evolutionary enlightenment and dynamized in a permanent change and transformation.
The falsity of this proposition of "infinite spiritual evolutionism" or infinite progressive enlightenment is that: going back to the level of the "SOURCE" is that THE SOURCE is outside of any endless progression, infinite progressive enlightenment, beginning or beginning of... and end or attainment of... The "SOURCE" IS OUT OF ALL TIME AND ALL SPACE. This means that the "SOURCE" does not evolve, nor does it progress because the simple motive of the SOURCE always IS; it has not evolved to become the SOURCE, nor is it in a constant "infinite spiritual evolution". If it were, it would imply that the SOURCE is established in a permanent state of incompleteness.
Therefore, progressive and infinite enlightenment is one more illusory concept of the "ego" within an illusory time and space.
All such considerations remain the product and by-product of the so-called "spiritualized ego" that persists and insists on the illusory need to endure even beyond "death" but this time with the strategy of subtleizing itself to infinite levels of perfection in the so-called spiritual realms of the intangible or density is spiritual. Now the "ego" has found the evolutionary-infinity (not the "eternity" concept representing that which is outside of time) as an instrument for self-perpetuation.
Enlightenment an Instantaneous, Total and Absolute realization
As I have already said, the SOURCE, is not enlightened since the SOURCE has never separated from itself. It would be ontologically incongruous to consider that the SOURCE, separated itself in order to be able to recognize itself in duality, separation, and limitation, as the SOURCE. The SOURCE, does not need to "know" itself in order to see itself projected specularly in a "world out there" of duality, limitation and imperfection, and by contrast recognize itself as non-dual, unlimited and complete or perfect. This idea in itself is insane because that would mean the impossibility of the SOURCE to be able to maintain the certainty of its completeness and perfection, it would have to rest on the idea of a world of limitation and imperfection and lack. How could it give back to it a mirror image of perfection and completeness that which is imperfect and complete per se and does NOT exist in the SOURCE because it was never created? This ontological aberration and its conclusion can only be concocted by the ego's demented mind that bases its existence on the persistence that the imperfect can improve what already IS perfect and the incomplete can complete what already IS complete.
Thus, moreover, since the SOURCE is beyond time and space, the idea of instantaneous realization is implicitly linked with the idea of time. But if the SOURCE is beyond all time, at what instant of its ETERNITY did it become illuminated? The answer is immediately obvious: AT NO INSTANT because in ETERNITY time does not exist and therefore no illumination was necessary or occurred or occurs. Therefore, likewise, we can conclude that if there is no such illumination in the SOURCE neither can it be, neither total, nor absolute since this idea starts from the impossible fact that the SOURCE at some point of BEING Total and Absolute. And this implies beyond any proposition of enlightenment that no separation has ever existed, exists, nor will ever exist.
However, enlightenment is a reality in this 3D world or in any "D" as long as you harbor in your mind the idea that separation occurred. And that being so, when enlightenment emerges from the oceanic waters of ETERNITY, you paradoxically realize that enlightenment never did, does, and never will occur.
Oh, and enlightenment is total, absolute and instantaneous.
#16 Re: English Forum » MariSwa & Kassia: Extractions and their problems, Part 4, » 2023-08-28 11:14:19
This is how I perceive myself as well! Stellar, Earth, and Source, all in one. I grew beyond just my "stellar identity" before inmersion by being on Earth, and my Earth identity also integrates its stellar counterpart. I am just ME. No need to define more. I am Source, and appear to be whatever I want to be and where I want to be.
Yes, correct, we all "are Source", But one thing is a statement of what you say you believe yourself to be, "source" or what is the same, to speak of the source intellectually and understand the logic of such a metaphysical proposition and quite another thing is to speak from the "SOURCE" itself i.e., Understanding directly that one IS the Source, without going through the rationalizing distorting process of logic and intellectualization of believing that one is the source (with lower case). In other words, it is one thing to believe in the "source" and another thing to LIVE FROM the same SOURCE. The perspective is diametrically opposite and this is reflected and expressed in daily life in many ways, especially in the field of identification as an individual, since it is from this UNDERSTANDING that one "lives and understands oneself in the world without being of any world". This instantly produces a liberation of all forms by understanding that the emptiness (Ether) from which the perceived forms apparently arise are also empty of all form. This is what Buddhists refer to with the term "Sunyata" which is expressed in the aphorism of the Heart Sutra: "form is emptiness; emptiness is form". And this brings you to a deep understanding that all phenomena we perceive are illusory or "apparent".
Therefore, the only reality of phenomena is not the phenomenon itself, but the observer who is behind all phenomena. But the observer must also be overcome or transcended, because there still remains the subtle residue of an entity and identity that is the product of the identification that is sustained on "the perception of the forms that it observes".
However, and sadly after such a strenuous achievement, there are individuals who, having reached this understanding-vividness of "Sunyata-Ether", believe that they have definitely landed on the Eternal shores of liberation from the insidious chains of the mind, being fascinated and hypnotized by such a portentous achievement. But NO. There still remains one more step, which is to UNDERSTAND and realize that which in Hinduism is called "Ajata" which is that which is beyond Sunyata-Ether. That is, the Understanding that NOTHING has been created. That is to say, that ultimately creation, the observer of creation also does not exist since there is Understanding and that there is no creation because there has not been and there is no beginning of creation and there is no completion of creation. That is, on the principle that what does NOT exist in the beginning nor in the end cannot exist in the middle.
That is, the world (universes-multi-densities-multiverses or whatever you want to mentalize or imagine") does not exist before or after manifestation, and therefore there is no "during manifestation" either.
Obviously, this is a twist that few, very few, scarcely, get to realize vividly, (not as a bunch of metaphysical beliefs and theories and information accumulated by the intellect that just became toxic narcotizing). Here even what is called or understood as "Source" ceases to have a meaning as "originator" or "creation". The idea of unity understood in that everything perceived is sustained in an undifferentiated Unity between the observer, the observed and known and the meta result of the unity of absolute of the "observer" is transcended; there appears the understanding that cause and effect are only possible concepts within the illusory perception of the observer and that the ultimate reality is that nothing is caused or affected by anything because NOTHING has been created. It is the Ineffability NOT caudad, or ABSOLUTE WITHOUT ABSOLUTE.
... And here the search, the seeker and the sought DISAPPEAR in the same ETERNITY...
Nota: Solo un punto de vista más.
#17 Re: English Forum » MariSwa & Kassia: Extractions and their problems, Part 4, » 2023-07-27 12:11:42
Your comment shows honesty, and that honours you, as you acknowledge where you are and not where others claim to be when they are NOT there; In them, it's just a cacophonic repetition of Yazhinian words borrowed in their minds from that which they have not yet achieved. A desire fueled by sterile logic that cannot bear fruit because words and concepts, if not planted in the fertile soil of experience and watered and fertilised with deep Understanding, which is freed from all logic, will become nothing but crutches for an invalid who wishes to run when all they can do is stumble with them at every step they take. Logic and the concepts that feed it may be a useful tool for someone who needs crutches because their mind is held hostage by their own mind, but logic will be a burden for someone who can already run and has light feet, and a heavy ballast for someone who has wings and can fly.
#18 Re: English Forum » MariSwa: Extractions and their problems. Part 3 » 2023-07-26 22:56:55
CHARCOtranquilo wrote:This is the best and most important sentence of ALL disclosure "We don't need to be extracted to be better versions of ourselves". It's clear that we can't run away from ourselves: the shit you haven't processed, will still be shit out there in 5D or any "D". Because following the path of cowards has its price; those who pretend to solve their failed lives using comfortable shortcuts to avoid the responsibility of assuming that there is a job to be done and that no "alien" or "terrestrial" can or will do it for you or anyone else.
The prison you have locked YOURSELF in, is not here on earth or "out there. NO. The prison in which you have voluntarily locked yourself up is IN YOUR MIND. That imaginary prison that you have so zealously concocted and that you feed and give reality every day; every time you put opium in the desire to be extracted by some supposed ET's, or every time you put the opium of hope in a new "love" that will give you that recognition and valuation that you think you need to feel special, unique.
This feeling of bastard specialism that is born from the darkest and darkest bowels of the most insidious and perverse selfishness, because it is disguised as good feelings and good intentions, All these psychological buffers are instruments of procrastination that tighten the chains of your mental dungeon and disable you and drain your will to assume in a mature and intelligent way, that in reality nobody can break the chains of your mind except you.
Few are those who have the true courage and bravery to go into that desert of absolute loneliness where you will find the only faithful traveling companion that can keep you company: YOU. And until you assume that vast desert of yourself in the most absolute company of your solitude, the chains of the mind that you now believe limit you, will not be able to transform their creaking into celestial music if you do not understand that you yourself forged them and the darkest of the prisons cannot be transformed into a shining beacon that illuminates the exit door if you do not realize that its lintel is supported on your own shoulders.
Until when are you willing to postpone your freedom at the cost of easy shortcuts, infantile romantic sentimentalisms and narcissistic hedonisms?....
You make some points I agree with, and some I don't. I agree with your point about "bastard specialism". It's good for people to believe in their own value, that they are each a unique, valued part of the universal whole. What is not good is the narcissism and elitism that permeates "starseed culture". People want to feel like they are "chosen" ones while others are not. The "blessed and the damned" theme of Abrahamic religions repackaged for those who consider themselves smarter than that. They even go as far as to speculate that people they see as not on their level of perceived "spirituality" don't have souls.
What I do not agree with is your devaluation of emotionality and romantic love. Yes, some people look for that sort of love for "recognition" and "valuation", and that isn't very healthy. Others have a more innocent approach and seek the giving and receiving of such love at face value, for the unique experience and the depth of interconnectedness with one other person on a level of two individuals which radiates outward to creation. I do not see that as "infantile".
What I personally see as "infantile" is the devaluation of such sentiments in a race for "spiritual supremacy". Spirituality devoid of emotion is not spirituality. There is no race to anywhere, only an endless journey. Negative, antisocial, narcissistic beings throw away sentimentality and emotionality in their pursuits of material supremacy, domination, and self-gratification. It disturbs me to see how some philosophies seem to call for the same mechanistic ruthlessness in the pursuit of spiritual power.
I think that in my previous post I have used metaphor and simile as a semantic resource to express myself and this may have given rise to the ambiguity of what I intended to convey.
Let's talk about that "romantic love", that "feeling that comes loaded with an exultant emotionality that magnifies and idealises in a vicious circle of virtues the person/object loved and disabling the capacity of discernment to the detriment of any objectivity in favour of common sense or critical obviousness losing sight of the possibility of contemplating the person with all their virtues, but also with all their true qualities less virtuous. If someone thinks immaturely that when we fall in love we are only going to live exclusively with those virtuous aspects, (which in their great majority have only been as I have said an idealised construction) invariably and permanently, that is a childish idea, that pretends to deny the true reality with which we will have to live in the same moment when the magic wand of the fairy of disappointment places the two lovers in a situation challenging enough to descend to the gates of hell.
Then there is that type of "spiritualised romantic love" that pretends to project an attitude and an image of love towards others, giving love indiscriminately showing, kind, considerate, attentive, unconditionally, thinking that in this way their life will be rewarded with more love and perhaps more joy and as a result people will respond more positively and even experience being "closer to "God" or the "Source" radiating an aura of loving light almost angelic.
The problem with this approach is that you cannot try to be loving above your current personal experience that is not very loving. You cannot place one feeling above another and expect to overcome that feeling by placing yourself in a dishonest situation with yourself in relation to the unloving situation you are experiencing. You cannot start where you want to be, because you simply are NOT where you want to be. Being honest requires observing oneself with some detachment in order to approach it objectively.
The acceptance that one is not as loving as one thought in oneself requires an act of humility. In fact the problem of provoking being "spiritually loving" is that you are denying yourself by considering that your unloving state is detestable and unspiritual. Pretending to love by rejecting yourself is not love it is only an imposture imagined of what one interprets as "spiritual love". And that is not the reality of true love. They are only distorted ways of understanding and personalising and adapting the idea "love" to our own and selfish needs to compensate for that permanent and insidious feeling of separation with the very Source of LOVE with capital letters.
Now comes the hard part of what LOVE is
The imperishable LOVE (with capital letters) is NOT an emotion, nor is it an idea about what it is to be spiritually loving, nor is it a sweetened romantic fantasy of exalted emotions of a "couple in love". LOVE, by integrating EVERYTHING, is not always kind, not always happy, and manifests itself in multiple forms of expression, even on occasions extremely difficult and challenging.
You cannot experience imperishable LOVE if when what you understand by love is based on preferences, because these require you to be fundamentally dishonest with yourself. You only want to see certain things and not others. You only want to be in pleasant situations and not unpleasant ones. You only want to be with people who share your point of view and not with people who do not. You want life to be a certain way, but life is NOT like that.
LOVE does not create it because it has no beginning or end. You cannot manipulate it because it always remains faithful to itself. In fact you can do nothing with LOVE because it is HE who holds you and not you HIM. You cannot increase it or decrease it because it encompasses everything from the deepest abysses, to the most inscrutable infinite space. You cannot fight for HIM, because he is not an object, or a subject, or an emotion that you can achieve and appropriate LOVE. Nor can you cultivate it, because it is not a process that develops steadily until "reaching LOVE"; it is LOVE who "reaches you" for this reason you can only prepare yourself to accept it and when you accept it you realise that it had always been present expressing itself silently in you.
The imperishable LOVE is not something that you generate just because you appreciate a situation or a person because it is not a behaviour, it is a silent, present and direct experience. It is something that is not manufactured and NOT created by the intellect; it is beyond any definition.
#19 Re: English Forum » MariSwa: Extractions and their problems. Part 3 » 2023-07-22 00:16:54
This is the best and most important sentence of ALL disclosure "We don't need to be extracted to be better versions of ourselves". It's clear that we can't run away from ourselves: the shit you haven't processed, will still be shit out there in 5D or any "D". Because following the path of cowards has its price; those who pretend to solve their failed lives using comfortable shortcuts to avoid the responsibility of assuming that there is a job to be done and that no "alien" or "terrestrial" can or will do it for you or anyone else.
The prison you have locked YOURSELF in, is not here on earth or "out there. NO. The prison in which you have voluntarily locked yourself up is IN YOUR MIND. That imaginary prison that you have so zealously concocted and that you feed and give reality every day; every time you put opium in the desire to be extracted by some supposed ET's, or every time you put the opium of hope in a new "love" that will give you that recognition and valuation that you think you need to feel special, unique.
This feeling of bastard specialism that is born from the darkest and darkest bowels of the most insidious and perverse selfishness, because it is disguised as good feelings and good intentions, All these psychological buffers are instruments of procrastination that tighten the chains of your mental dungeon and disable you and drain your will to assume in a mature and intelligent way, that in reality nobody can break the chains of your mind except you.
Few are those who have the true courage and bravery to go into that desert of absolute loneliness where you will find the only faithful traveling companion that can keep you company: YOU. And until you assume that vast desert of yourself in the most absolute company of your solitude, the chains of the mind that you now believe limit you, will not be able to transform their creaking into celestial music if you do not understand that you yourself forged them and the darkest of the prisons cannot be transformed into a shining beacon that illuminates the exit door if you do not realize that its lintel is supported on your own shoulders.
Until when are you willing to postpone your freedom at the cost of easy shortcuts, infantile romantic sentimentalisms and narcissistic hedonisms?....
#20 Re: English Forum » The Forum's Multi-Density Jukebox ♫ ♫♪ ♫ ♫♪♪ ♪ » 2023-05-02 13:27:12
Virtuosity... A wink to Yazhi.
Paco de Lucía & Al Di Meola - Mediterranean Sundance
https://youtu.be/C97H_HvBjPA?t=45
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VDzcUb4 … %E1%99%ADO
Giani Lincan | Cimbalom | Classical music
(Apparently the Ummites were fascinated by this interpreter.)
https://youtu.be/AOm6SsMq5Hw?t=38
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fA0ogXB … ianiLincan
Liber Tango? [Best Version] bandoneon x violin,cello,piano (A.Piazzolla) / with 고상지
#21 Re: English Forum » Mari: Why Did the First Contact Project Fail? » 2023-04-15 20:42:52
CHARCOtranquilo wrote:JimiPickle wrote:Understanding. There was once an ego, “I”, that wanted to save the world from itself. This “I” thought it could change the world outside… Now, there is nothing happening by no one.
JP
My friend, you entered this forum in search of galactic adventures of distant planets and inhabitants of other worlds and the adventure took you to the only place of man which is at the same time the furthest away for those who are blinded by the crystalline shine of the false trinkets brought by foreigners who imitate the diamond and who believe to have in their hands a great fortune and closer than their own breath for those who, being blind of TRUTH, dare to enter the darkness of their own ignorance believing it to be an impenetrable land and end up finding the true diamond that grants true vision and that had always beenset in their own pupils and that is, the zero distance of the Self.
If you are not intoxicated with the wine of Understanding, you will not become sober with the kiss of freedom.
Mi amigo, you have a gift with words. Thank you for helping me SEE.
You're welcome, my friend,
The Vision was always there, you just decided to "look" honestly at "your dilemma" and "step aside for THAT to work"; THAT just "drew you in" and your dilemma fell apart.
A hug my friend.
#22 Re: English Forum » Mari: Why Did the First Contact Project Fail? » 2023-04-14 09:19:18
CHARCOtranquilo wrote:JimiPickle wrote:There was a moment where I wanted an intervention, there was a moment when I offered to help, now, there is no desire for either.
JP
What is that unexpected thing that has changed, Jimi?
Understanding. There was once an ego, “I”, that wanted to save the world from itself. This “I” thought it could change the world outside… Now, there is nothing happening by no one.
JP
My friend, you entered this forum in search of galactic adventures of distant planets and inhabitants of other worlds and the adventure took you to the only place of man which is at the same time the furthest away for those who are blinded by the crystalline shine of the false trinkets brought by foreigners who imitate the diamond and who believe to have in their hands a great fortune and closer than their own breath for those who, being blind of TRUTH, dare to enter the darkness of their own ignorance believing it to be an impenetrable land and end up finding the true diamond that grants true vision and that had always beenset in their own pupils and that is, the zero distance of the Self.
If you are not intoxicated with the wine of Understanding, you will not become sober with the kiss of freedom.
#23 Re: English Forum » Mari: Why Did the First Contact Project Fail? » 2023-04-13 20:52:40
There was a moment where I wanted an intervention, there was a moment when I offered to help, now, there is no desire for either.
JP
What is that unexpected thing that has changed, Jimi?
#24 Re: English Forum » Mari: Why Did the First Contact Project Fail? » 2023-04-12 22:16:30
Spain (people drink, have parties, celebrate, go to beach while their higher selves are drowned in partying (sorry Gosia, this comes from my friend who lives in Toledo)
Cliché... 
... But yes, the cliché is partly true but not entirely true. My British friend would say that "God save Spain from British politeness and decorum". Although sometimes it needs it in order not to lose its British north.
#25 Re: English Forum » Za'El: Light and Darkness within you / Traumas and Limits » 2023-04-03 12:55:19
This proposition of seeking a balance between "Light and darkness" is a "spiritual" fallacy: light and darkness, evil and good, Life and death, separation and integration, are irreconcilable concepts. To believe that they can be reconciled or, failing that, to find a compatible balance between opposites is to consider that the solution to the peace of your mind depends on a negotiation between "evil and good". Only the ego seeks this type of pacts because its survival depends on them. Therefore, the solution is NOT to seek to "balance" the unbearable tension that generates this type of false balance between opposites. The solution is to see/understand that both beliefs are ILLUSORY.
Only the Understanding that both beliefs are illusory, places you in a mind and understanding, free from the conflict of "compatible opposites". When the LIGHT enters the darkness the shadows simply vanish because the shadow has NEVER been able to vanish the light; it can hide it, yes, but it can never make the LIGHT disappear.
"The matrix" is not abandoned through the balance of opposites. "The matrix" is abandoned only through the end of all illusions, including and especially the spiritual ones.