I fully agree.
I remember that I filmed the ISS with a Nikon P900 camera (I can't find the film on my computer at the moment) and just like here. https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=deskt … BSEXs&t=0s

I also live by the maxim:

Read everything, watch everything, listen to everyone - but only believe what you can personally confirm.

I am not saying that extraterrestrials do not exist,
I am only saying that there cannot be any large satellite, in an orbit of 505 km,
which would be visible as a very bright star,
and at the same time not be noticed by hundreds of thousands, if not millions of astronomy enthusiasts.
Astronomy forums are bursting at the seams, there are tons of people there.
If such an object with a brightness comparable to the ISS appeared in the sky,
it would be immediately written about everywhere. Literally everywhere.

Nevertheless, it would be perfectly visible to the naked eye if it were actually in an orbit 505 km high.
Even if it only reflected 0.1% of the light.
The ratio of reflected light to incident light is expressed as a percentage and in astronomy it is called albedo.
Besides, what is there to write about, since Aneeka claims that it is visible as a "very bright star".
I am an astronomy enthusiast myself, many times I saw a bright object flying from west to east and it was always the ISS, the position was always correct when I turned on the ISS tracker during the observation to check where the station was currently located.
Toleka - if it existed, I would have seen it with my own eyes a long time ago (with the naked eye, you don't need any telescopes or even binoculars!) 505 km is such a low orbit that any large object (we're talking about a manned cruiser), even black in color, would be it would be easily visible to the naked eye and would be bright enough to attract attention, unlike other satellites in the night sky.
At what orbital altitude are the GF ships supposedly located, and what are their dimensions?
Are Toleka's dimensions given anywhere? length, width, depth?

I know these proportions from my own observations of weather balloons.
The radiosonde under the balloon is the size of a pack of cigarettes and I can see it through binoculars even from a distance of 30 km, even in the middle of the day. I also see a cord connecting the balloon to the radiosonde, which is less than 1 millimeter thick.
Watch this video. https://youtu.be/OHujWZyiklc?t=82
And what it looks like up close.
https://eu.jsonline.com/picture-gallery … 119888001/
The balloon is at an altitude of 11.5-12 km and the diagonal distance from the camera lens is about 16-17 km.
So a shoebox illuminated by the Sun in low Earth orbit can also be seen with the naked eye.

Ask Taygetan/Swarunian what NORAD ID their ships have.
Everything that is in Earth orbit, absolutely all unmanned and manned satellites - have NORAD ID. It is an American military security system for identifying all objects of artificial origin located near the Earth.
For example, the International Space Station has NORAD ID: 25544.

If the Galactic Federation doesn't mind, let the Taygetans set up a website to track their ship in low Earth orbit, just like they do with the ISS.

http://www.isstracker.com/
https://live.ariss.org/dashboard/esamap/

Or at least they will send a list of flights like this:

https://heavens-above.com/PassSummary.aspx?satid=25544

Then I will know when to look at the sky and in which direction so as not to confuse the Taygetan ship with something else

What's impossible about sending humans to the Moon?
"Taygetans" say it is deadly ionizing radiation from the Van Allen belts surrounding the Earth.
Ok, but how quickly would they kill the astronauts? Probably not immediately.
What if you built a lead shelter with walls one meter thick and put people in it while they flew through the Van Allen belt?
I know that such a shelter would weigh several hundred tons and would have to be carried in parts to Earth's orbit and assembled there - but it is feasible (of course, assuming that the radiation is so great that it would immediately kill the crew)
Such a lead shelter would protect even against the radiation found in the underground of the Chernobyl reactor, the so-called "elephant's foot" at which the radiation is enormous.
"Taygetans" say that unmanned missions can easily leave Earth and go into space.
The only obstacle to manned missions is supposedly deadly radiation.
Somehow I am not convinced that if this were the case, people would not find a way to land on the Moon, which, considering the cosmic distances, is very close to us.
And even if you don't land (some conspiracy theorists argue that the computer in the lunar lander's module had too little power to calculate the orbit after taking off from the lunar surface in order to connect with the command module there) - you can at least circle the Moon and return to orbit.
In total, there were 8 Apollo missions that left Earth's orbit and landed near the Moon with humans on board.
6 of them landed on the surface.
A total of 24 people have been near the Moon. And none of them, even on their deathbed, would said a word that it was all a lie?
In total, about 400,000 people worked on the Apollo program for 10 years - and no one would ever say it was all a fraud?

If the Van Allen belt radiation were really so strong, we would have extremely bright aurora borealis all the time and there would be no night on the planet, and we would also have much higher levels of cosmic radiation at the Earth's surface than it actually is.

Cosmic radiation becomes a problem only during a manned expedition to Mars, but not because of its high value, but because astronauts would be exposed to it for 500 days and not for a few days as in the case of the Apollo mission.
And still - even such a long exposure of astronauts to radiation would not cause immediate death, but at most radiation sickness.
Today, space agencies place great emphasis on the safety of astronauts, and during the Apollo missions there was a Cold War and no one cared about the safety of astronauts.
To achieve the propaganda goal, it would be enough for people to land on the Moon and die there, either because of radiation or a lander failure.
The only thing that mattered was the fact that man had set foot on the Moon. At all costs.

I understand that you have objective, verifiable evidence that the "Taygetans" are truthful.
If so, maybe you would like to share it with us.

I also believe that the Apollo missions really took place and that 12 people walked on the Moon
and 24 were in lunar orbit.
There is no reason why astronauts should be killed by Van Allen belt radiation.
It was the time of the Cold War, the USA wanted to show superiority over the USSR
and did everything to land a man on the Moon.
There is no way that the radiation from the Van Allen belts was the same
as in Chernobyl during the reactor explosion in 1986, where even some people survived.
I think that the USA at that time of the Cold War would have decided on
the Apollo missions even if the radiation was strong enough to kill the astronauts,
but with a delay, e.g. a month after returning from the mission.
I consider the fact that people landed on the Moon as part of the Apollo mission to be certain.

However, the interpretation of data from the seismic experiment conducted
by NASA during the Apollo 12 mission
and the Department of Defense's "chapel bell" experiment during Apollo 17
(it is still secret to this day) raises doubts.
The moon is probably hollow (and therefore an artificial object).

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U6bQh1EU5n0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L72s_23V-HQ

Gosia, and somewhere I heard on your channel that Taygetans can simulate our earthly aircraft,
complete with lighting system and RADIO SIGNALS.
So the Taygetans are playing around with transmitting radio waves after all.