You are not logged in.

#1 2024-04-24 09:44:41

HelHun
Member

Things of harmony and frequencies

I explain it with sticks. We're going to play a little song. Here in these densities, with some we are ONE, but with others we are about 1,567,824 different (number for illustrative purposes), AND NOT BECAUSE THEY SELL ME A MASS full of concepts that those who sell it do not apply, I am going to be the forces another number when they make no effort to integrate or understand what I already am in that "ONE". They only apply spiritual concepts to justify that I, as a BEING, must be something else and therefore abide by rules and restrictions that are far below what I already AM!
Well no! Not even mathematically that is possible, it will be NO.
A higher D doesn't come down like that through lies or manipulation, I'm really sorry, they'll have to make a little effort to go up, learn a few more things and maybe one day they'll understand. Hopefully.
So don't come to me with stories of integration when in a regressive way you don't make even a little bit of effort in that direction towards what I am here and right now.

Last edited by HelHun (2024-04-24 09:45:25)

Offline

#2 2024-04-25 04:11:16

Horton HaW
Member

Re: Things of harmony and frequencies

Hi HelHun. I am not sure whom you are addressing. Is this a general philosophical viewpoint?


A person's a person, no matter how small.

Verum vident finem noctis - See the truth will end the night. ~Yazhi Swaruu

Offline

#3 2024-04-27 18:46:26

Kirion
Member

Re: Things of harmony and frequencies

Horton HaW wrote:

Hi HelHun. I am not sure whom you are addressing. Is this a general philosophical viewpoint?

He seems to be talking about his absolute exclusivity, which he is glad about. In fact, every personal being can boast of this. As for me, integration is not a merger, but a constructive community. Yes, this requires points of contact in the form of common interests, which, however, do not deny the personal. That is, the will of two or more personal beings can be united in the sense of aiming at a certain goal without merging personally.

[spoiler]Похоже, он говорит о своей абсолютной исключительности, чему рад. На самом деле этим может похвастаться каждое личное существо. Как по мне, интеграция не есть слияние, а конструктивное содружество. Да, для этого нужны точки соприкосновения в виде общих интересов, которые однако не отрицают личного. Т.е., воля двух и более личных существ может быть единой в смысле направленности к определенной цели не сливаясь при этом лично.[/spoiler]

Offline

Board footer

Powered by FluxBB