Taygetan and "Swaruunian" Team Forum

Robert369

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Yet, even more important than "how to excite the Aether" is "how to collect the resulting Aether energy", because most methods only pick up a miniscule amount and thus require needlessly much excitation.

If the goal is to harvest the spark gap pulse (your excited aether), then a capacitor (aka condenser) can collect/store the energy.

No, that's not the goal or how it works because this would only collect a miniscule portion of the EM waves that fake-science teaches about. Yet, 99.9999+% of the universe is of non-EM type and thus needs to be approached differently.

This is where consciousness and true science meet, and understanding that and how they are both one and the same (aka beyond fake-science) is key to designing anything worthwhile. Fake-science disallows "free energy" by design, thus making use of it doesn't lead to anything worthwhile, meaning that one needs to think outside of the fake-science box.

Not that any discussion about this topic in a public place like this can lead anywhere really, because as Andromedans and others who utterly regressively run the Earth's 3D Matrix have proven, having high tech without sufficient consciousness is not a wise combination.

Hence I teach the real things to those who are ready for it only, by that making sure it doesn't get abused. Especially after Earth has had more than enough of such abuse for millennia already.

Last edited by Robert369 (2022-04-30 17:18:05)

---

Helping people to self-empower and liberate themselves, and by that ultimately the whole planet and beyond. See my profile for means to connect.

Pymander

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Super excited to see the new Base-12/Free Energy video coming out in a few hours! (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWlBno92CFg)

For the last month I've been traveling for work and haven't had the time to do any experimenting with these things. Hopefully the new video provides some fresh clues as to how all this works. I'm not sure if any of you have greater knowledge of specific Rodin Coil designs that may work; but, these are a few of the designs I had planned on trying that were based on Base-12 math using my understanding of the same principles people had used to create designs for previous coils (but with Base-10). I'm not sure if it really makes a difference or if we just need to start using better materials or perhaps scaling the designs up. Also, like Robert mentioned, these designs are probably just barely scratching the surface of zero point energy and just harnessing a tiny tiny fraction of the Aether.

Here was one design I was gonna try using a 20 point circle with each winding going +9 points (or -11 if you go the opposite way). One of the difficulties I expected was getting the coil of wire through the center as it becomes quite narrow. However, I do want to try this out as someone on YouTube made a similar 20 point design going +7 points and it seemed to be more powerful than average designs. The red and green lines marked the beginning and/or end of one winding. 

IIRC, this design I drafted was based on the minimum # of points possible to simplify the design. It would require 2 counter overlapping windings... like one color is starting from the top, the other from the opposing side.

VoitecArianski

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Hello
This is re-copy of my ealier post in this forum, this document is a little bit outdated, but idea of 12 base math and symmetry is shown, I also found interesting mathematical relations in 10 base math, prime numbers and divisors. It is also correspond witch device that i try to figure out from scrath, with is shortly a toroidal transformer witch CW and CCW coils looped together.. (more info about that what i know will be published openly).

Older Post:
according to the topic, base 12 Vortex math, i placed this  andswer in Facebook,  so  I paste it in forum  link to PDF file because is to much to put:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1q86qv6 … sp=sharing

  Square positional system (base 10 math),  symmetry between the numbers:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/18JLSMs … sp=sharing

naringas

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

As far as I can tell, none of this 'vortex maths' stuff is unknown to maisntream mathematics (the engineering and energy stuff, on the other hand, I dunno).

however, they do use their own specialist language to talk about it.

as I see it, the mathemeticians base everything on set theory, which makes the higher lever stuff (i.e. modular rings which are the rudiments used in maisntream math to talk about vortexes) more complicated than it could (arguably).

I do wonder to which extent this is purposefully obfuscated (made complicated) in bad faith; I always have to remind myself that at the end of the day (from the 'standpoint' of the conecepts and the ideas) it doesn't matter which vocabulary one uses to talk about the concepts/ideas.

here's a fun video about a "toy" notational system for numbers, this one is base-20, the fun part is how they combine the glyphs (simiar to hangul, the Korean alphabet). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EyS6FfczH0Q&t=21s

Last edited by naringas (2022-05-05 18:33:02)

Dablin

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

In follow up to Cosmic Agency's recent video "Free Energy (Zero Point) and Base 12 Extraterrestrial Mathematics - Information from Outside Earth" I wondered what the full 12x12 table would look like so I decided to draw it up in MS Paint.

I created a small low resolution 12x12 number table with each symbol occupying a 11x13 pixel space. I drew the characters how I believed they went together from how I understood the video. At that small resolution it isn't really useful for anything other then a low-resolution font but it was easier to work with; which for me worked fine as I'm a computer programmer not an artist; and was easier to modify/correct and overview as I was drawing it.

I did though realise something about the symbols as I was drawing them. There were a couple of reference images in the CA video, one initially presented the base number symbols with specific numbers labeled "No symbol". I very quickly made the connection there though before that was even explained. These included the numbers 3, 6 and 9 numbers as distinct separated vertical lines. The next was a reference image of the numbers up to 24. I noticed that in that reference the vertical lines designated has horizontal connections at the bottom left and top right.

Initially I didn't understand why. Just assumed it was how it would look if someone wrote it down with a pencil in one stroke. With that in mind I initially chose to ignore the horizontal connections. After drawing the symbols myself though it did eventually occur to me though that the connections helped separate the individual symbols (digits) amongst each other. I am not sure if that is the actual reasoning behind them, but without them quite a few of the numbers would have been nothing but a combination of digits made up by just vertical lines with a slight spacing variation. Very hard to tell apart and distinguish what lines belonged to what symbol.

I can only imagine how the Taygetans use these symbols on their displays, especially in combination. I was wondering along the terms of the spacing between symbols, whether monospace or proportional and how long do they chain these symbols for large numbers. As difficult (different) as it seems to me I am sure they read these with absolutely natural ease. It definitely peaked my curiosity and imagination.

Wener

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Introduction:

It would be great if someone ... could provide their thoughts on all of this. I think this is the mathematical basis of how zero point is accessed; but, I’m not sure how to turn this math into a physical device. I think there is still more to be uncovered before creating a theoretical device.

Good approximation; Thank you!.

Some comments:

1) My idea is that a rotating superconducting fluid is needed inside the supposed Rodin-type winding or another.

Explained in another way; the superconducting fluid would circulate in rotation as if inside the toroid (the toroid would not have to be full).

Perhaps the speed of rotation is one of the keys to get the response from the other pole (in the Ether), and perhaps it does not have a single value, but rather depends on various conditions of the specific system that is "attempting" the connection.

Perhaps the key to generating resonances lies in the speed of rotation.

2) I understood in the last recent video on these matters, that the configuration of the system should not produce asymmetric energy nodes, but centered.

I mean in height (I have prepared an image but I think it's not possible to upload it, or I don't find how, just links are allowed I found).

3) I also think I understood, although maybe I'm wrong, that Taygeteans don't use zero among their numbers, that would be; its base-12 does not start with a zero.

Greetings.

naringas

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

In follow up to Cosmic Agency's recent video "Free Energy (Zero Point) and Base 12 Extraterrestrial Mathematics - Information from Outside Earth" I wondered what the full 12x12 table would look like so I decided to draw it up in MS Paint.

https://www.paulmoffat.net/sites/defaul … 121113.png

I created a small low resolution 12x12 number table with each symbol occupying a 11x13 pixel space. I drew the characters how I believed they went together from how I understood the video. At that small resolution it isn't really useful for anything other then a low-resolution font but it was easier to work with; which for me worked fine as I'm a computer programmer not an artist; and was easier to modify/correct and overview as I was drawing it.

I did though realise something about the symbols as I was drawing them. There were a couple of reference images in the CA video, one initially presented the base number symbols with specific numbers labeled "No symbol". I very quickly made the connection there though before that was even explained. These included the numbers 3, 6 and 9 numbers as distinct separated vertical lines. The next was a reference image of the numbers up to 24. I noticed that in that reference the vertical lines designated has horizontal connections at the bottom left and top right.

Initially I didn't understand why. Just assumed it was how it would look if someone wrote it down with a pencil in one stroke. With that in mind I initially chose to ignore the horizontal connections. After drawing the symbols myself though it did eventually occur to me though that the connections helped separate the individual symbols (digits) amongst each other. I am not sure if that is the actual reasoning behind them, but without them quite a few of the numbers would have been nothing but a combination of digits made up by just vertical lines with a slight spacing variation. Very hard to tell apart and distinguish what lines belonged to what symbol.

I can only imagine how the Taygetans use these symbols on their displays, especially in combination. I was wondering along the terms of the spacing between symbols, whether monospace or proportional and how long do they chain these symbols for large numbers. As difficult (different) as it seems to me I am sure they read these with absolutely natural ease. It definitely peaked my curiosity and imagination.

this is really cool. could you share a bigger image?

we should make this into a font! (gotta figure out how it's done)

Nonlinear1222

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Let’s get together and share notes on research?

Dablin

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

this is really cool. could you share a bigger image?

we should make this into a font! (gotta figure out how it's done)

Hey naringas, no problem. I just scaled the image 400% and updated the file. I probably should have done this originally. Hope this helps. If this were to be created as a font I recommend by someone with artistic/drawing skills , I consider this just a mockup out of curiosity and pretty much is the extent of my drawing talent.

Last edited by Dablin (2022-05-08 23:32:08)

naringas

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

I've finally had a closer look at the numerals shown in the transcript.

I think I get it well enough that I could explain it in earthly human mathematical terms.

For the most part, it's like they say, a positional base-12 numeral system. But it looks like to me that they sometimes join the positions by multiplication and sometimes by addition.

to put an example in decimal terms, why is "11" eleven and not two?? it seems like the taygetian numerals like to play around with this creating ambiguous terms like

:—.

being read as either 25 or 301.

I wonder if

— — —

is 144 + 12 = 156 or is it 12*12*12=1728 (12 cubed)

I also wonder if then, 12 could be (besides the —)

.—

But I would really like to see how they taygetians deal with fractional numbers (which correspond with angles).

This has me wondering if they have been in contact with lots of humans for a long time, surely they've talked to people with deeper mathematical understanding who could surely very clearly explain in human terms how this all works?

finally, I'll link to "rational and universal geometry" which builds all of human geometry without using angles (no sines, no cosines, not even circles at first). I find this really cool and it's on my priority list to keep diving into and maybe somebody else does too.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_Pr … l_Geometry
http://www.cut-the-knot.org/pythagoras/ … Knot.shtml

Last edited by naringas (2022-05-09 01:06:05)

Dablin

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

naringas, from what I understand, the information provided in the video appears to be a very simple kindergarten level introduction to their number system; or atleast one of them.

No concepts dealing with formulas such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division were given let alone dealing with angles. I am also curious on how a base 12 numbering system would deal with geometry and angles. I always wondered how manipulated our sin, cos, tan functions etc were, in the sense that I have for a while understood human mathematics to be limited/intentionally compromised. I have tried to contemplate how one would calculate an angle by some other method. For the most part, the sin, cos, tan functions etc are very reliable and atleast work in the limited scope us humans have adopted it for.

In terms of

---

I will admit their is some confusion even for me. For most of the paired symbols, as per the table I created. The first symbol indicates a multiplication against 12 and the second an addition to that result.

So for example, :. = 2x12 + 1 (25)

The last column though seems to operate a bit different. It appears to be a direct multiplication across two symbols. ie. :- equals 2x12 (24).  As per the previous columns :- could have been interpreted as 2x12 + 12 (36) but that doesn't appear to be by the rules of the system that was described. So there is a level of inconsistency here, or maybe the consistency is just how the Taygetan society choose to collectively apply them.

As their numbering system is missing zero I almost feel like the last column acts as a sort of zero in some respect providing the means to describe the next power of the base 12 system.

I'll admit, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this.

Last edited by Dablin (2022-05-09 01:36:43)

Gosia

Administrator

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Yes, its very basic as this is not really a Math 12 presentation. It was a casual chat where Swaruu showed us some basics. She was supposed to develop a proper subject about it but she never got around to it (as she said, translation of symbols and formulas was a monumental task), and now she is not here. So I waited 2 years to share that conversation in case any one else up there decides to give more thorough information about it but I don´t think they have enough time for that at the moment, so I decided to publish what I have. In no way is it meant though as a proper Math 12 presentation. More of a teaser.

naringas, from what I understand, the information provided in the video appears to be a very simple kindergarten level introduction to their number system; or atleast one of them.

No concepts dealing with formulas such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division were given let alone dealing with angles. I am also curious on how a base 12 numbering system would deal with geometry and angles. I always wondered how manipulated our sin, cos, tan functions etc were, in the sense that I have for a while understood human mathematics to be limited/intentionally compromised. I have tried to contemplate how one would calculate an angle by some other method. For the most part, the sin, cos, tan functions etc are very reliable and atleast work in the limited scope us humans have adopted it for.

In terms of

---

I will admit their is some confusion even for me. For most of the paired symbols, as per the table I created. The first symbol indicates a multiplication against 12 and the second an addition to that result.

So for example, :. = 2x12 + 1 (25)

The last column though seems to operate a bit different. It appears to be a direct multiplication across two symbols. ie. :- equals 2x12 (24).  As per the previous columns :- could have been interpreted as 2x12 + 12 (36) but that doesn't appear to be by the rules of the system that was described. So there is a level of inconsistency here, or maybe the consistency is just how the Taygetan society choose to collectively apply them.

As their numbering system is missing zero I almost feel like the last column acts as a sort of zero in some respect providing the means to describe the next power of the base 12 system.

I'll admit, I'm still trying to wrap my head around this.

Dablin

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Yes, its very basic as this is not really a Math 12 presentation. It was a casual chat where Swaruu showed us some basics. She was supposed to develop a proper subject about it but she never got around to it (as she said, translation of symbols and formulas was a monumental task), and now she is not here. So I waited 2 years to share that conversation in case any one else up there decides to give more thorough information about it but I don´t think they have enough time for that at the moment, so I decided to publish what I have. In no way is it meant though as a proper Math 12 presentation. More of a teaser.

Haha Gosia, as a teaser it definitely served its purpose. This along with your previous videos touching the subject, it has really opened my mind and interest in this new numbering system. I'll admit, I used to associate the base 12 system as archiac and primitive. With its associated feet as a measurement and other imperial units etc, I considered the metric system far superior and easier to understand. But unlike my parents and previous generations I was never forced to learn imperial measurements as a child so ofcourse there is definitely personal bias in hindsight.

I never realised of the connection to natural systems and even advanced alien civilasations that the base 12 number system has. It is for reasons such as this that I am drawn to and grateful for information such as your Taygetan communications. Its allowed me to expand my understanding of things, if only in limited human capacity and break away from some of those rigid ideals I developed.

I look forward to any other communications that may come in follow up to this. Thanks Gosia.

Last edited by Dablin (2022-05-09 08:04:19)

*** It's me ***

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Thanks Dablin for the diagram. It has the fell of an old-school monochrome (green) monitor

I also tried to create a list of numbers from 1 to 301 (the largest number shared by Athena).  Using A, B, C, ..., K, – to represent 1, 2, 3, ... 11, 12.

If we knew the correct way to represent the following numbers, perhaps it would help with understanding their base 12 math:

145  =  ––A  or  ?
156  =  AA–  or  ?
157  =  ––A  or  –AA  or  AAA  or  ?
168  =  –B–  or  ?
299  =  BK   or  B–K  or  ?
300  =  B–   or  B––  or  ?
301  =  B–A (provided by Athena).

Athena explained ⦂–⚬ = (2 x 12^2) + (1 x ^12) + (1).  
Direct substitution from their digits to ours gives 2 12 1 which doesn't quite work lol.  
In our base 12 math, number 301 = (2 x 12^2) + (1 x 12^1) + (1 x 12^0) → 211

Another thing that human's base 12 is different from Taygetan's is:

Ours:
 12 →  10 (2 digits)
 24 →  20 (2 digits)
144 → 100 (3 digits)

Theirs:
 12 →  – (1 digit, not as ⚬–).  I wonder if ⚬– is a valid sequence of digits in any number.
 24 → ⦂– (2 digits)
144 → –– (2 digits)

Edith_S

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Hi everybody.
I am not too good at mathematics, but there's this video that explains the vortex math, maybe you could be interested???

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZrO90AI0c8

Tesla’s 3-6-9 and Vortex Math: Is this really the key to the universe?

---

The Situation Is Hopeless But Not Serious, Paul Watzlawick

Dablin

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Hi Edith_S, thanks for the video link. The latest video from the Taygetan's though implied that Tesla's 369 diagram is missing the required 10, 11 and 12 from its considerations and the center of the energy connections are not centered as they should be.

I did try both 11 and 12 point circles to test the same methodology as used for Tesla's 9 point. The 12 point circle though didn't want to connect back to itself correctly, whilst the 11 point circle matched what Pymander considered was the Base-12 diagram within the original post of this thread.

12 POINT CIRCLE

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  O   X   E

1*2   			  = 2
2*2                       = 4
4*2                       = 8
8*2 = 14 = 1+4            = 5
5*2                       = O
O*2 = 18 = 1+8            = 9
9*2 = 16 = 1+6            = 7
7*2 = 12 = 1+2            = 3
3*2                       = 6
6*2                       = E
E*2 = 1E = 1+E = 13 = 1+3 = 4

11 POINT CIRCLE

1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11
1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  X   E

1*2            = 2
2*2            = 4
4*2            = 8
8*2 = 14 = 1+4 = 5
5*2            = X
X*2 = 18 = 1+8 = 9
9*2 = 16 = 1+6 = 7
7*2 = 12 = 1+2 = 3
3*2            = 6
6*2 = 10 = 1+0 = 1

At this point I am still unable to figure out how to use Base-12 mathematics and generate a pattern connecting across the center of the circle. I am probably doing something wrong within the 12 point circle or my maths is off; or both. I initially considered trying a 12 point circle as the Taygetan's give single-digit type symbols up to the number 12 within their mathematics system and I wondered if that had implications.

Last edited by Dablin (2022-05-15 08:30:07)

naringas

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Hi Edith_S, thanks for the video link. The latest video from the Taygetan's though implied that Tesla's 369 diagram is missing the required 10, 11 and 12 from its considerations and the center of the energy connections are not centered as they should be.

I did try both 11 and 12 point circles to test the same methodology as used for Tesla's 9 point. The 12 point circle though didn't want to connect back to itself correctly, whilst the 11 point circle matched what Pymander considered was the Base-12 diagram within the original post of this thread.

[...]

At this point I am still unable to figure out how to use Base-12 mathematics and generate a pattern connecting across the center of the circle. I am probably doing something wrong within the 12 point circle or my maths is off; or both. I initially considered trying a 12 point circle as the Taygetan's give single-digit type symbols up to the number 12 within their mathematics system and I wondered if that had implications.

there's a subtlety (for the lack of a better word) regarding the number zero. as I understand this, the "issue" (again, for the lack of a better word) has to do with start from 0 or start from 1.

I think the underlying issue here, is a lot like in regular game cards starting at 2, and then going up in value until the "ace" which also represent the number one. It's something like this but with the participation of "zero" in the role of the ace; and card-2 is numerical 1. (this is just one not-very-serious perspective, maybe it'll make this more confusing in which case just ignore it)

speaking more seriously (though I'm actually typing this), and taking into account the "Mathologer" youtube video. All this is built from multiplying numbers together, and then taking the reminder (modulo). And this causes an "equivalence" between 0 and the "base" for the modulo operation (the number which will divide) which is equal to 10, 11, 12.

the idea is that having done this modulo operation, your result will always be a number between 0 and the number which will divide.

for example, using 12 we get 12 "equivalence classes" (earthly mathematical term) which are these twelve things 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. In the level of abstraction used by mathematicians it doesn't matter at all if you write 10 or A or whatever. This is not the point.

the cool (sometimes confusing) part is that keeping on the 12 equivalence classes example, the 12 is 0 once around the circle. in this sense, the tesla 9 point is actually 0 to 8, i.e. in the perspective of a mainstream mathematician, the 0 is where the 9 is drawn in the circle

I have started to consider that what the Taygetians actually refer to as a "base-10" actually referes to "decimal point". Which has a lot more to do with how we write fractions ("rational numbers") than with base 10. IMHO, the base 12, or 11, or 2 and 16 (both used around computers) is just a parameter. which specific number we use has been 'abstracted way' by people who learn and undersand enough mathematics. This to say that the decimal point has everything to do with computation/calculation (in a strictly theoretical sense).

naringas

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

I found this really nice video about base 10, base 12, and the promoted (in the video) base 6.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qID2B4MK7Y0

knoxvilles_joker

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

During a meditation this morning your post came to mind then I got a message to ask you to align the coil to the earth's electro magnetic field. I have no idea how you can do that but im hoping it will make sense to you

There is a device called a magnetometer.  It measures position relative to earth's magnetic field on axis x,y,z. 

This is a unit I have used in some of my cosplay projects
https://www.adafruit.com/product/4646
It is a Bosch BNO055 that measures readings of:
magnetistm  (magnetometer)
gyroscopic
acceleration
It is nice as it spits out the finished reading and you don't have to do some of the fancier math in your script.

So the real question is does it have to be in a set relative position on one axis, or all 3.  I think 3 as we are on the 3rd dimension or 3rd plane of existence.

---

Cosplayer and prop/costume maker.  Taking cutting edge tech and making science fiction into real life with mostly movie accurate builds.

knoxvilles_joker

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Are there any reference images on how the toroidal reactor needs to be designed or wound with base 12 math as the basis for its core design?

---

Cosplayer and prop/costume maker.  Taking cutting edge tech and making science fiction into real life with mostly movie accurate builds.

knoxvilles_joker

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

I am trying to wrap my head around things a little on a possible design that popped into my head

If you look at the design of a 3 phase induction motor:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=59HBoIXzX_c

Notice the Stator has 6 points or magnets and they are wired in an array similar. 

Now take that design and alter it.  Add coils to  10 points and build as a rodin coil. 

The rotor would then be affected by the Aether and the squirrel cage on the rotor would turn. 

But you can't hit the right frequency.  Then you would need toroids to tune the frequency of each coil through trial and error

Now the question comes in the rodin coil as to where the energy goes out to.  Does it go out the rotor as rotational force?  Or does it go out to the wires as a source of power and the rotor is stationary?

And then how are you looking at measuring output voltage as we call it? 

Really the question to ask on these motors is how do you handle the massive flows of power out? 

What phase in our terms are we looking at wiring up to, and then we can exclude phases to get the desired voltage. 

Seafaring ships here internationally use 3 phase power. 

So really in our terms what phase are the ships running at?  Is there a nominal voltage for most systems and then the more advanced power hungry systems such as propulsion and weapons would be measured in scales larger than TeV.

---

Cosplayer and prop/costume maker.  Taking cutting edge tech and making science fiction into real life with mostly movie accurate builds.

Wener

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

Now the question comes in the rodin coil as to where the energy goes out to.  Does it go out the rotor as rotational force?  Or does it go out to the wires as a source of power and the rotor is stationary?

In the center of the toroid hole is where you would get the most energy, in an axial direction.

Rodin coils are just an approximation to the optimal solution (as a coil). I think a fluid superconductor must circulate inside the toroid.

This superconductor together with the conductivity of the winding, and an appropriate adjustment of speeds / frequencies, they produce "the magic".

Wener

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

There is something that does not fit me:

We are talking about Rodin coils as a device, at least the best we have around here, to produce energy, specifically: zero point energy.

Rodin's coil would be the base material device (apart from others), and the Merkaba scheme, with the two pyramids inverted, would be nothing more than that; a theoretical scheme. The implementation would be the toroidal device.

Well.

But on the other hand, we have the story that the physical pyramids, e.g. Keops pyramid, were zero-point energy-producing devices. There was another inverted, etheric, pyramid, and the result was the production of energy at the central point of the scheme, which is the central point of the toroid, that is; in the queen's chamber.

Well also.

But in the latter case; where is the toroidal physical device?

knoxvilles_joker

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

There is something that does not fit me:

We are talking about Rodin coils as a device, at least the best we have around here, to produce energy, specifically: zero point energy.

Rodin's coil would be the base material device (apart from others), and the Merkaba scheme, with the two pyramids inverted, would be nothing more than that; a theoretical scheme. The implementation would be the toroidal device.

Well.

But on the other hand, we have the story that the physical pyramids, e.g. Keops pyramid, were zero-point energy-producing devices. There was another inverted, etheric, pyramid, and the result was the production of energy at the central point of the scheme, which is the central point of the toroid, that is; in the queen's chamber.

Well also.

But in the latter case; where is the toroidal physical device?

THat is why I think the stator on an induction motor would be the equivalent toroid if properly redone.

The egyptians are all based upon lies.  The egyptian giants that talked in a dull roar?  Egypt being very hostile to anyone questioning history?  The Sphinx that looked like an apes head?  The pyramids were stripped and adulterated to backup a lie. 

There is nothing to say that Egypt was not a Teutonic/tartarian outpost and it was over run at some point and the rule and traces therein were destroyed...

---

Cosplayer and prop/costume maker.  Taking cutting edge tech and making science fiction into real life with mostly movie accurate builds.

Pymander

Member

Re: Investigating Zero Point Energy and Base-12 Mathematics

So I know it's been awhile since I made this original post. I never forgot about it, though I kinda hit a wall figuring out how to apply all of this to a Rodin Coil's geometry. I am still working on that, BUT, I think I just uncovered a "mathematical proof" as to why we should be using Base-12 over Base-10 and it made me super happy!

This is a Modulo multiplication table. You multiple the columns by the rows and then take the sum and add the individual numbers together until you get a single digit. So for example (in Base-10 to keep it simple) 8*8 = 64 ... 6+4 = 10 ... 1+0 = 1... therefore, on a Modulo multiplication table 8*8 = 1.

On the right is what happens with a typical Base-10 table. Note how the 1 and the 9's are all skewed towards one side without any symmetry. Compare that to Base-12 on the left... everything is balanced and in harmony.

Edit: I made a mistake in the original graph and forgot to include the "E" digit in Base-12. Curiously, in Base-10, the 9 digit is found several times in the middle of the graph, whereas in Base-12, "E" is only found on the edges. I kinda think this is the basis of why the Pyramids have 4 sides leading up to a pointed tip. 

Last edited by Pymander (2023-07-12 19:47:36)