You are not logged in.
- Topics: Active | Unanswered
Pages: 1
#1 Re: English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-28 01:52:55
This doesn't make sense to me, as it would mean that if you experience both of two opposites you would lose that experience as the learnt things "cease to exist". This exactly is not what integration is about, but instead it is about having both in you and making use of both as you see fit by your free will, meaning that integrating more simply allows to make more choices.
From my experience, the reason our choices are increased by integrating opposites is because we grow from that experience ("increase frequency"), expand our awareness, perceive more (and deeper) both inside and outside, etc. The increased choices have nothing to do with "the freedom to act benevolent or malevolent".
For example, emotional wounds are created by a lack of love in childhood and stay with us throughout life until healed. When you bring love to an emotional wound (lack of love), it heals and dissolves through integration of opposites. You do not lose anything by the painful wound dissolving.
Your approach calls "being able to make use of free will" to be Regressive, which would at the same time mean that benevolent ones have no free will anymore ? Free will is absolute and it is your decisions that make you Regressive, neutral or whatever positive variant
I agree, free will seems to be absolute. Ultimately, it seems that the only choice there really is is either moving closer to Source or not. As such, beings that are very close to Source in the higher densities act only in benevolent ways while of course being able to act in malevolent ways too. They just don't do it.
This actually seems to be similar to what you are saying.
#2 Re: English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-28 00:39:43
Calling "Luciferians" to be "Regressives" is way too simplified, which likely is why my more differentiated reply is misunderstood. This even more so, as Swaruu explains "acting from an integrated perspective" thoroughly, so you basically call her "Luciferian" for that ? You might want to rewatch the relevant videos to find the difference here.
I don't think Swaruu said anything about "being free to act benevolent or malevolent". It simply makes no sense: If you see that we are all one, why would you act malevolent towards anyone?
Yes, we need to protect ourselves but that is hardly "acting malevolent" - and the best protection is simply not attracting/manifesting the regressives in any case, as Swaruu has said.
The only ones who act benevolent towards some and malevolent towards others are the regressives. They can be benevolent towards their own family, for example, while exploiting and manipulating others for their own gain.
That again is not what she teaches as a whole but only a small portion of it that is lacking context (coming from Swaruu and not Yazhi), because later as Yazhi she also correctly says that anything is in duality as long as one isn't "back to Source", because already to exist is duality via being and not being.
The key understanding here is that duality comes in many facets and levels, and only after integrating something and it's opposite one can be free from this duality by being able to freely chose one's action in every single situation without losing balance, meaning that when living in duality one goes by one path but cannot change at will (which is the lack of integration).
Different levels of duality are e.g.
lowest duality: eatable by me/eats me, good/evil, male/female (what we usually call duality)
medium duality: I/not I (loss of individuality)
high duality: existence/non-existence (loss of being)
Thus, each level of duality is teaching another facet of options that one can handle - and one better learns both/all sides of each option to get balanced/integrated.
Yes, this is how I see it too - different levels of duality and less duality as you go up in densities. Though I disagree somewhat on the effect of integration of opposites. When you integrate your "shadow" (such as anger charges or emotional wounding), it simply ceases to exist and all you are left with is who you really are. At our core we are "positive", i.e. love, peace, etc. So it is more like integration dissolves the illusory "negative" part and leaves only the real you, which is "positive".
#3 Re: English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-27 23:52:55
These are teachings of those who still are on those path, but once you are beyond that you understand that STO is separation too: You create a "helper" and a "victim in need of help" - and to be a victim you firstly need a "perpetrator". This means that STO and STS are working together because they cannot exist without each other, by that choosing to be one creates the other - and by that separation.
"We are all One" is beyond that, cooperating and supporting others without needing a "poor soul in need of help" because we live from our inner strength, while also accepting that the ones that need help chose to be a victim for both the experience and to exist as necessary counterpart for both STO and STS.
Cooperating and supporting others because we see that "We are all One" is the definition of STO. The "Law of One" is about that, for example. The STO path has nothing to do with needing "poor souls in need of help", but simply cooperation and support of each other.
Yes and no, because it depends how one understands these words: "Good and evil" are pretty much clear in our world, but "benevolent and malevolent" are not of identical meaning. Yet, since you speak of duality, I guess I was unclear, so I shall rephrase what I mean:
When one has accepted, fully understood and then integrated both good and evil and by that is in balance, one can freely chose to act benevolent or malevolent without coming out of balance because the opposite within oneself exists as counterpart. By that one can "take sides" while remaining non-dualistic and thus in higher frequency than the dualistic way of life allows.
"Integrating good and evil" and "being free to act benevolent and malevolent" is what Luciferians teach (regressives). If you see that we are all one, why would you act malevolent towards anyone?
Swaruu has said that 1D through 5D are densities of duality, and only once you reach the higher densities does duality cease to exist:
"Swaruu: To me, everything above 5D or 6D is universal already, not localized. It cannot be localized, by definition. There cannot be Sirians in 7D, nor Pleiadeans in 7D... why? In these places there is no duality as you know it here, for us in 5D or humans in 3D, it includes all, and in those high densities the localities are dissipating"
#4 Re: English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-27 18:55:05
STO and STS are simply dualistic approaches just like good and evil, which become obsolete as soon as one realizes that we are all one.
Once that is turned into inner balance, one will be able to see that helping oneself is helping all of us too - if done in the right way, of course. This means that it is not about helping "oneself or others", but about thinking/feeling/acting generally benevolent or malevolent.
From what I understand, realizing that we are all one is a part of the STO path - while the STS path is that of separation.
And isn't acting "benevolent or malevolent" the same kind of duality as good and evil? Maybe the lower densities are supposed to be dualistic, so that beings can learn and grow through that contrast?
#5 Re: English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-27 06:31:37
Thank you, Eldon. I will look for that video.
It seems that the concept of Service to Others has been described in a sort of roundabout way when Swaruu and others talked about the need to have empathy, no attachments, as well expanding awareness to the point of starting to see others as a part of oneself - or one larger whole.
What I was wondering about in particular is that other sources like the Law of One or Cassiopaea say that the Ascension process from 3D to a higher density requires a "polarization" to either STO or STS. And that the STO route is actually easier since it requires being only 51% STO to "qualify" for Ascension.
If that is really the case, it is an important topic to cover.
#6 English Forum » Service To Others (STO) vs Service To Self (STS)? » 2021-02-26 17:30:52
- Alexander
- Replies: 12
Gosia and Robert, can you ask the Taygetans whether this concept is a true representation of universal laws?
Basically, the idea is that the regressives are applying "Service To Self" (STS) while the positive races are applying "Service To Others" (STO). This concept has been around since the Ra/Law of One channeling in the 1980's and can also be found in the Cassiopaean material.
STO/STS is supposedly a universal distinction, even as it applies to the Ascension to a higher density. Some sources say, for example, that 3D people need to be 51% STO in order to graduate to the higher density. Supposedly, there is an alternative Ascension route for STS people, which requires them to be 95% STS.
Thank you.
Pages: 1