There is so much conflicting info out there, who do we believe?

Jupiter 9 · 2022-11-14 20:00:27

This is a very common question or comment I see many times here or in the YouTube comments section, so I wanna share what the crew always says about this, prompted by Beatleincaravan's question on another post. These two transcripts are very important and worth revisiting. The Joan Manifesto is one of my favorites.

From the transcript/video: Yazhi Swaruu and Gosia - JOAN MANIFESTO - Message for the Starseeds in the Times of Crisis

(Bold mine)

Yazhi: "You are living very hard times. Especially with regards to information. The regressive forces you are battling hide truth among lies. They not only censor information, with an even greater attempt to remove and control it all, but they also use as their primary weapon to bury what they cannot suppress or censor in countless other pieces of information that looks like the one they are trying to suppress or remove, that way the greater public cannot tell what is truth and what is a lie.

So you are simply suffering from a very real information overload where it's just about impossible to discern truth from lies. So, as I have always said, please do the work as no one can or will do it for you. Research and learn all you can about the most important subjects in your life in order to make up your mind about what is truth and what are lies.

But you must do it refraining from only listening to so called experts in whatever field, no matter how far such a field may be from what you feel is your expertise or your frame of possible understanding.

Those who ask you not to listen to others because of any number of reasons seek to control you, seek to control your minds, your lives and your very soul! Whoever asks you to blindly believe in whatever they impose, no matter how good a reason they have, is basically negative because they are suppressing other pieces of knowledge you need to make up your mind about reality, your reality.

All information in general, and in theory, is good for you, even the lies, even the garbage, only within the frame of any given time, and this is where you must see what to listen to, or read. But the more you know about everything, or about any subject you are researching or that concerns you, the better, including the garbage about it, because it's all part of that subject and you must be aware of it. And from that space of responsible knowledge you must trust yourself to be wise enough to be able to filter out what serves you as truth.

Because as things are on Earth nowadays, it is impossible to discern truth from lies when researching controversial subjects, and nowadays controversial subjects are… basically of life and death transcendence.

[...]

In all this confusion, there is only one person you can fully trust, and know that he or she has your best interest at heart! Only one person who can decide what to do next and what is truth for you. That person is You!! And you alone!

From the soul level, the stellar level, starseed level, this is the nature of the dynamics of what is going on, on Earth and what is expected of you; to take ownership over your destiny in spite of all adversity and all obstacles, because those are mind obstacles! Mind only! No power, no money, which in itself is another form of power, resides in your mind and in your creative ability.

[...]

Research, listen to everyone who you feel may hold something that you need or that could be useful to you, then be responsible and wise, and with the best information available to you at any given moment. Then you take active action towards the direction you need to go, and at the same time holding a high frequency of thought in all the meaning and in all the definition of holding a high frequency.

Research, then thought and discernment, then action under high frequency! [...]"

Last edited by Jupiter 9 (2023-07-17 19:49:27)

Jupiter 9 · 2022-11-14 20:02:36

Also Yazhi says the same thing in this very relevant to this question transcript/video:

Exopolitics and Ufology Circles and CIA - Infiltrations - Yazhi and Athena Swaruu

(Bold and underline mine)

Gosia: I would like something more specific. Some more clues. If they exist. Because there is a lot within the official narrative. And some things are true, some things are not. How to identify the things that are NOT true?

Yazhi: We accept the true things. But there is no way to identify if something is true or not true. There isn´t. You can only try to understand as much as you can, inform yourself by listening to ALL sources of information and only after that come up with your own particular idea about what is real and what is not real for you, always with a view to leave behind, without attachment, any certain model of reality if a better model arises to replace it, and that better model should only arise from the head of each one of you, and never from authorities. Including me.

If there is a clue? Although it is not a completely reliable clue, what they say will have overtones of dis-empowering people, of making them follow something, it will also go with agendas that are known to be of CIA like gender, global warming, or the whole long list of NWO stuff. Anything that makes them delegate their hopes to an external savior. Anything that makes them feel they have no control over their own lives, anything that makes them feel they fall into determinism. Most of all the most direct clue is that it follows the accepted norms of the expert "authorities" and goes hand in hand with well identified agendas.

They should not follow us either, they should only follow themselves. But what they can decide for themselves is who to listen to the most and who not to listen to. From an absolute point of view it is useful to listen to a Catholic mass. But from the perspective of having limited time, it is better to establish priorities.

Because for that limited time, this happens: that a person is the sum of what he listens to. That is to say, each person is the result of the external content they listen to, (Youtube, books, magazines, programs, movies, and opinions of friends and family). You are the average of it all. Be careful what you consume, because it shapes your mind.[...]"

Jupiter 9 · 2022-11-14 20:41:11

This is also a very relevant transcript to this question where Aneeka adds another angle:

Scalar Internet - MultiDensity Properties of Internet - Anéeka of Temmer (Taygeta, Pleiades)

(Bold mine)

Anéeka: [...] So from the explanatory point of view of "timelines" seen as separate lines, what happens online and is reported on the Internet is not necessarily what goes on in the timeline of another person who is observing it. So what is provably false news for one person is provably true for another. And everything will depend on the level of consciousness and perception of each individual.

In other words, the Internet contains information, events, data, and everything related to various timelines that humans consider different. To the degree in which some terrorist attack is not carried out in one timeline, for example, and in another yes it was carried out.

Creating with this extreme confusion among the human population since what is perfectly true for one person or group, is completely false for another. Strictly speaking, both being right. This is a problem that has not been detected by human science due to its null understanding of the nature of time, densities and reality itself.

So the Internet will contain many timelines, with contradictions and all, creating there a sea of confusion, a soup of information and misinformation bordering on the impossible to verify. Leaving to each individual, as we have explained many times, total control and responsibility to discern what is real and what is not. Empowering yourself with responsibility for what you believe and why you believe it.

[...]

Robert: Good. Last question. How to know which information is correct? Or we cannot know? Or will it be correct because it is in accordance with our level of consciousness, understanding consciousness as "our ability to perceive multiple things"?

Anéeka: Things, data, whatever, are not correct or incorrect, neither true nor false, it is the observer who gives them that value with his own scale of values and according to what he knows and what fits into the framework of reference that he has created or accepted for himself as objective reality.

The observer has two options.

1. Going with the mainstream and comfortably believing whatever the "authorities" tell you to believe.

2. Taking your own responsibility to learn everything you can about all possible topics and to build your own conceptual framework from which to decide for yourself what is real and what is not.

Option 1 leads to disaster and the end of civilization.

Option 2 leads to freedom and a free, holographic society.

You decide.

#1 2022-11-14 20:00:27

There is so much conflicting info out there, who do we believe?

#2 2022-11-14 20:02:36

Re: There is so much conflicting info out there, who do we believe?

#3 2022-11-14 20:41:11

Re: There is so much conflicting info out there, who do we believe?

Board footer