Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

Happy · 2023-01-30 14:47:30

The problem with science on Earth (English)

Published: January 30th, 2023

Mari Swaruu's channel: https://www.youtube.com/@SwaruuOficial

mitkobs · 2023-01-30 15:30:59

Cabal mainstream science = another religion = dogmatic line of thought. They can ditch all other religions and still will have a superior tool of religion to control even and especially the atheists(non believers in anything beyond and metaphysical).

ro2778 · 2023-01-30 18:18:43

This is a good video to watch in addition to Mari's comments on science (https://odysee.com/@PROJECTCAMELOT:d/pr … -o-leary:5). It's very long (50minutes at double speed), but he's an interesting guy, former NASA Astronaut, and then planetary physicist working at top universities. He always had good timing, and had a knack for moving on in life before getting bogged down.

He worked directly with Carl Sagan and Cornell on planetary physics, and noticed that Sagan would always rubbish the UFO / ET idea, which was of interest to him. And then recalls, that Sagan was on some advisory committee advising the president to bury the UFO topic in the early 60ies at the same time as their private conversations, because if the public knew they would panic or some such nonsesnse. So he realised Sagan was part of some higher scientific cabal that was influencing the public and president, and colleagues, away from the topic as a legitimate topic of study.

Next he moved on to MIT, which is when he started to take an interest in paranormal topics and by day, he was a normal physicist and in his time off he was attending workshops, learning how to remote view and other things. He describes how he couldn't reveal what he was interested in to colleagues, because at their faculty meetings their favourite topic was to ridicule paranormal research. He didn't know it, but one of his colleagues was actively researching paranormal topics in secret, but they could never collaborate because neither of them would reveal their interest publically due to the stigma.

He then moved to California at which point his former esteemed colleagues got word that he was interested in paranormal studies, so didn't miss him. He had a car accident on the way, which led to a near death experience, therefore further cementing his experiences and interest with the paranormal.

He still needed to support his children through college so he worked for a notorious black budget engineering firm, although, refused to work on any areas that could be militarised, so was fired after a few years, as he was adding no value to that corproation and went into full time paranormal roles, working in churches and then later writing books. He was also a MUFON director and this is when he started to experience his past being erased. Some body had redefined the meaning of ex-astronaut to mean, someone who had been above 50,000 feet and he had never flown as he left NASA before the Mars missions he trained for were cancelled. So then the lawyer at MUFON publically challenged him as he had been told his credentials were false, but fortunately he had paperwork that proved his past. And similar erasures happened at university employers, which again he could prove, due to keeping payroll paperwork etc. Although, if you call up a university he had worked for, then they would deny he ever worked there as a clear strategy to try and erase him. Similar to Bob Lazar.

He was also interested in the free energy world, and attended a conference, that was attended by many researchers with promising inventions. And when he looks back at the photo of the people in that conference, many of them would soon be tragically "suicided".

I don't really like Kerry's direction at Project Camelot, it seems she has turned into a white hat groupie these days, and is definitely suffering from information overload, but some of her interviews are worth a listen. Gosia interviewed her once, https://youtu.be/KT2nDXsv0X4

Interesting recent article from her: https://projectcamelotportal.com/2023/0 … ur-planet/

Last edited by ro2778 (2023-01-30 19:11:08)

ro2778 · 2023-01-30 19:01:25

I like how she said, the "modern university" because ironically the ancient university was very much about spirituality:

"The Latin etymology in the root of the word university: versus unum (towards one), which contains the sense of completeness, totality, movement towards integrity; but the uni-versities have long forgotten their raison d’être."
-The School for Gods by Elio D'Anna

Happy · 2023-01-31 10:13:19

What Mari is doing in this video, is to take the banned "TED-talk" of Rupert Sheldrake from 2013 two steps further, by rightfully connecting the warped scientific culture in the world to secret societies and a deliberate control-structure. And she encourages us all to investigate this for ourselves. It's very exciting!

arkangel · 2023-01-31 13:01:53

Back when I was asleep I used to think all those intelligent scientists and governments must realise that if they worked together they would achieve so much more, I couldn't work out why they didnt see/do this.

Then I found out why.....

Alec · 2023-01-31 13:17:38

arkangel wrote:

Back when I was asleep I used to think all those intelligent scientists and governments must realise that if they worked together they would achieve so much more, I couldn't work out why they didnt see/do this.
Then I found out why.....

This is why Earth Scientists are always divided.
They accept the science but always question "why" and "how". Because they know something is missing, it just doesn't add up. No dot connection.

StarDeity · 2023-02-01 02:30:50

At the end of the day, despite what the scientist might have discovered, the scientist would publish the final opinion of the person or group that funded their research, which is the cabal most of the time, instead of the truth of what they found.

arkangel wrote:

Back when I was asleep I used to think all those intelligent scientists and governments must realise that if they worked together they would achieve so much more, I couldn't work out why they didnt see/do this.
Then I found out why.....

HelHun · 2023-02-01 04:05:53

As it is! What's more, as a student you don't have the right to question either, not even for learning, less if you can't prove anything. It is taught the same as dogma in our books or manuals. And as in the military, it is directed not to think, to obey in order to approve, and likewise in a job.

Very tragicomic about the measurement of the constant of the speed of light. Keep measuring to see if one day it turns out the same hahaha
I imagine that because of the fat salary the teacher repeats it year after year if they can't apply it anyway.

Anyway. I also have no doubt in saying that there is already another "science" that is censored and that is not financed in any way, that only reaches the sidewalk of the educational centers and does not enter, nor does it enter the offices, it lives mostly in the head of the starseeds. And will live forever!

The example of Snow White and asking a fictional character to validate the same novel as real is very graphic. APPLIES TO ALMOST EVERYTHING! And it is part of the mass programming. YOU SEE IT EVERY DAY ON THE NEWS AND THE REALITY SHOWS OF POLITICIANS validating each other, with the latest variant: POLITICAL-SCIENTIST TRYING TO MATCH SCIENCE THAT VALIDATES POLITICS AND POLITICS THAT VALIDATES SCIENCE. I BELIEVE THAT RELIGIOUS AND RELIGIOUS DOGMAS HAVE BEEN DISPLACED BY POLITICIANS, THEIR DAYS ARE NUMBED UNLESS IT IS ONLY USED AS A LEGAL PLATFORM WHERE TO MOVE WITHOUT PROBLEMS.

I'm sorry for what I'm going to say, I don't want to do it but my soul asks me to, I try almost not to write but I must. The same thing you express applies to 5D or out there. Still in my own perception in 5D and above. Specifically on the subject of "natural laws" or "universals" which I think is a long way off and there is still a lot to learn but as I said at some point it is a spiral construction process and it will be difficult to perceive if it does not open up to more.

I can't stop laughing at the example of Snow White's dwarves who validate Snow White. It is like the example of Q? The one with the black and white hats? Whites accept blacks and vice versa. Those from Biden to Trump and vice versa and the rest are just dwarfs.

The big question here is how to skip a dogma to pretend to do it without doing it and at the same time survive? Because with the new monetary system I don't think that people on the street or who don't go to the little chapel (school) can survive without being forced to accept another new set of dogmas. By the way, if you don't swallow at school or university, they force you to swallow through paid media on TV, YouTube, etc. by pseudoscientists called journalists who in turn destroyed their mental compartments with false theories of what a journalist does .

mitkobs · 2023-02-01 06:41:56

The real science is the Mind/Consciousness. What Mind think/feel/imagine happens literally immediately without questions effortlessly and perfectly even in imperfection. Even in 3D slowly but securely.

Last edited by mitkobs (2023-02-01 06:43:31)

HelHun · 2023-02-01 16:07:59

HelHun wrote:

I can't stop laughing at the example of Snow White's dwarves who validate Snow White. It is like the example of Q? The one with the black and white hats? Whites accept blacks and vice versa. Those from Biden to Trump and vice versa and the rest are just dwarfs.

By the way, an observation and question. From long ago they were removed from the middle, parasitized or cloned the nobility in order to govern. Today it is not so useful thanks to the political system that they parasitize and clone anyway. That is already old but I am going to the point, THE NOBILITY AS SUCH HAS THE DAYS COUNTED, THEY ARE ALSO OBSOLETE FOR THE NEW MATRIX. It is not true??

Last edited by HelHun (2023-02-01 16:09:30)

HelHun · 2023-02-01 16:15:29

HelHun wrote:

HelHun wrote:
I can't stop laughing at the example of Snow White's dwarves who validate Snow White. It is like the example of Q? The one with the black and white hats? Whites accept blacks and vice versa. Those from Biden to Trump and vice versa and the rest are just dwarfs.
By the way, an observation and question. From long ago they were removed from the middle, parasitized or cloned the nobility in order to govern. Today it is not so useful thanks to the political system that they parasitize and clone anyway. That is already old but I am going to the point, THE NOBILITY AS SUCH HAS THE DAYS COUNTED, THEY ARE ALSO OBSOLETE FOR THE NEW MATRIX. It is not true??

And... with technology, cameras, AI, etc. THE POLITICAL SYSTEM ALSO HAS THE DAYS NUMBED!

Happy · 2023-02-02 02:43:23

HelHun wrote:

HelHun wrote:
HelHun wrote:
I can't stop laughing at the example of Snow White's dwarves who validate Snow White. It is like the example of Q? The one with the black and white hats? Whites accept blacks and vice versa. Those from Biden to Trump and vice versa and the rest are just dwarfs.
By the way, an observation and question. From long ago they were removed from the middle, parasitized or cloned the nobility in order to govern. Today it is not so useful thanks to the political system that they parasitize and clone anyway. That is already old but I am going to the point, THE NOBILITY AS SUCH HAS THE DAYS COUNTED, THEY ARE ALSO OBSOLETE FOR THE NEW MATRIX. It is not true??
And... with technology, cameras, AI, etc. THE POLITICAL SYSTEM ALSO HAS THE DAYS NUMBED!

Some interesting questions there, HelHun. As you indicate, there are several "paradigms" - or perhaps these are actually the matrix-forming "social agreements" mentioned so often in the Cosmic Agency material - that seem to approach a crumbling of sorts. The constructs of Earth's scientific establishment and methods are under a huge pressure these days. We have the discipline of physics, of course. Then we have nutrition, health and medicine. - and politics and economics. - and the social sciences themselves.

All this points to our basic understanding of knowledge, of how it is established; both individually and as a socially accepted construct, the sources of data, and the requirements each source brings with it to be socially accepted or acknowledged in communications. A difference in such requirements within each source has usually been considered proof of inadequacy for the Earth's dominant cultures - a great risk for the establishment, and such given reason for ridicule, moral degeneration, and even murder of those who dare to think beyond the limitations insisted upon.

The paradigm pointed to isn't about the facts themselves, but how they are established in the first place. My own relation to this is contained in the phrase "science never said a word, humans do." The reason why this is considered so radical, is that the source for collective agreements will always be the individual, and it is only via the individual's acceptance and compliance that the controllers - and by extension the collective - can maintain the limiting dogma, and ultimately to use the threat of violent force to sustain their [edit:] imposing authority.

Happy · 2023-02-06 14:21:56

The problem with science on Earth. (English)

Mari Swaruu, @SwaruuOficial
Published: January 30th, 2023

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2V80gvXGDk

All rights reserved. You can use a part of the video but please do not re-upload it completely and much less without clarifying that I'm the original owner of the video or leaving such ownership ambiguous. Please always include a link to the original video from my official channel. Thank you very much. Mari Swaruu

The problem with science on Earth

Hello once more.

I'm Mari Swaruu.

A few centuries ago in the Middle Ages and before - if they actually occurred of course, the general population of Earth mostly in western societies - although this occurs in others as well - followed and obeyed what their religious leaders dictated to them.

This mainly occurring with the Catholic church as the main example, or whatever they said was the truth, just because they said it was, and they justified everything they said because it was supposedly written in the Holy scriptures.

Those "truths" were fixed and unmovable, and it is from there where the word "dogma" came from.

To be "dogmatic" is to follow and obey rules - no matter what, any rules - and the subject cannot even think about questioning the truths imposed upon.

The mere thought that those rules and truths may be wrong is considered reprehensible, wrong, and even ludicrous.

They are considered to be unmovable things a population must simply accept and abide by.

Most of the times a population is so immersed and blinded by the dogmas imposed on them, that they cannot even think of the possibility that there may be other ways to see and interpret things outside the truth-frame imposed on them, simply because they lack all necessary context to see further.

Therefore, anything outside their dogma is an impossibility and cannot exist.

Then there is another added factor of thinking in practical terms - and of time being wasted - so the subjects can't see any point at all in questioning things that are already known.

They will ask themselves these questions:

- "What for?"
- "To what purpose?"
- "What is therein for me?"

And to make things worse with this last point; if they dare question dogma, the result people will get, is to be attacked, discredited, and even ostracized by their peers and by the society they live in.

Therefore, this goes against their very survival.

So people in general, especially those who have something to lose, will see no point - and even see it as dangerous - to even question any dogma, and this is yet another reason why people are kept in fear, so they have no time and no interest in questioning anything at all.

To be able to analyze anything, including today's subject, we must assume things based on what we consider to be the best information we have at our disposal at any given time.

As a way of thought, it is best to always keep an open mind and a willingness to replace any and all the information we may have when we are faced with better or more accurate information, and even the criteria of what is better.

And what "more accurate" means, has to evolve with ourselves as we go.

So, based on what I just said, the best information we have indicates that there is a group of entities - human and other - that do control what occurs on Earth from the shadows, and have been controlling the human population for at least a few thousands of years.

This in itself is a huge subject, but I know that at least most of you listening to me right now have come to that conclusion on your own, so that is my base assumption for what comes next.

One of the things such a group that controls society on Earth needs the most, is to control the general population so they can exploit them as a resource and also so [the population] won't go and rebel against them.

So, evidence shows that they created religions - and dogma with them - all under the basic premise, that if you go against what they say, you will be utterly punished in the harshest of ways.

But basically, the imposition of religious dogma is the best way to mind-control and guide the perception of the general population, and with it creating an entire reality with its set of rules and laws, that will work in favor of whoever is controlling said society, as it was deliberately designed by them.

So, religion and its dogma were engineered with the sole purpose of controlling the population within the society they control.

Few people dared to question religious dogma back then, and the ones who did question were mostly because they themselves were coming from another religion and its dogma.

But even the ones who were wise enough to be able to analyze everything objectively, and could come to the conclusion that many things in religious dogma simply didn't add up, simply had no way to prove them wrong.

And this is the point where the scientific method came along a few hundred years ago, and as an apparently new method of analyzing and explaining the world.

And this is where one of the first assumption spawn from - the systematic neglecting of all things that hint towards spirituality, because of their immediate association with religion.

Even to this day, most people confuse spirituality with being religious.

This dissociation with all things spiritual helped to arise and develop the concepts behind materialism, and with them the principle of simplifying all things; to dissect and to cut everything into small pieces, in order to try to explain the whole.

All in an attempt to explain away everything that was uncertain.

This leads to a mechanistic way of interpreting and of analyzing everything that is being studied; this means that human science has the clear tendency to assume that everything can be explained in mechanical terms.

They see everything as a machine that works because of its parts, thinking only in terms of cogs and levers basically, neglecting with it all that would have anything to do with spirit.

This is when it is easy for us to see how the controllers of Earth's society saw the need to control and regulate science, so it wouldn't work against them.

Worded differently, they needed to regulate science, so it wouldn't expose the lies and tricks that they need to control the masses.

So the cabal - or the controllers there on Earth - started to teach science, and for that they developed the concept of a modern university, where they could have everything under control, brainwashing and guiding the perception of new generations of scientists.

All this I've said means that science on Earth is heavily regulated with the direct intention of maintaining and directing all its achievements, and to keep them under their scrutiny and control.

What we see here - quite clearly, I must say - is that science on Earth is nothing more than yet another dogmatic religion; developed, regulated and designed, with the exact same purpose as any other religion in the past and present, and that is to control the perception of reality - what is possible and what is not - and to hinder the creative capacity and limits of the population in general; to keep them submissive, obedient and in fear.

On Earth, people assume that if something is scientific, then it is true and real.

They blindly believe in the infallibility of the scientific method, and they blindly accept anything that is scientifically proven as dogma.

They assume that science already knows how everything works, and that it has already deciphered all the secrets of the universe, except for the fine details.

This is by far the best religion the controllers - whoever they may be - have come up with.

It is a self-contained, self-validating, dogmatic religion that ostracizes, bans and ridicules any one of its members, who may dare question what has already been decided to be fixed rules and so-called "laws of nature."

So that comes to the next dogma people on Earth assume is correct, that science had found and understood the so-called "laws of nature" - or the laws of anything or everything.

Science on Earth pushes their concepts as dogma when they are only theories they cannot prove, and in order to be able to move forward, they come up with other "laws" they call under another name, for example "constance", and the best example of this is the speed of light.

Science imposes it as a dogma, as something fixed - therefore a mathematical constant that other calculations use as their base.

I had to go and research this, and I encourage you to do the same.

Even on Earth, light-speed is not a constant.

They have been measuring it for well over a hundred years, and it always comes up with different values - some quite different.

So, scientists started to make an average reading, and came up with what is considered to be the accepted constant speed-value.

But as the readings continued and the results continued to vary, in 1972 they came up with some kind of formula that always comes up with the same result, as the formula itself contains the accepted value of the speed of light, so the formula moves with the variations when they appear.

This - in my opinion - is not science; that is self-validation.

You cannot use a fixed speed-of-light value as a base constant inside the same formula, that validates its same constant.

That is secular thinking.

It is like asking a character in a fiction novel to validate the same novel as real.

It is akin to take for granted that Snow White is a real person just because Grumpy and Sneezy said she was.

And I found the same problem again, involving the "gravitation constant," and I'm quite sure this will be the case with many - if not all - other so-called "universal constants" used in physics.

And why would they do such a thing?

To what purpose?

As we've said before, to be able to control, guide and monitor human perception in order to keep it exactly where they need and want it to be.

This causes exactly what we've been saying for some time now, that science on Earth, all of it - but especially physics and mathematics - are only self-contained and self-validating constructs, that do not reflect the so-called outside world, but that are useful as a control mechanism, as any other religion would be.

And the scientists in their white robes are noting other than that religion's priests; the ones that must contain and guide everyone else into complying with their rules and laws.

There are two different sciences on Earth; the one for the people - all contained, dogmatic and inflexible, therefore collapsing the very nature and purpose of science itself - to be curious, to ask questions and to replace old concepts with better ones - therefore useless as a science, but useful as a dogmatic religion.

And the second science, not available for the public; a science only for the cabal, the controllers of Earth and their members.

It is at this level where real technological advances take place, and from where such novelties are retro-fitted into the popular level of science when - and if - it is for a purpose useful for the cabal and controllers.

That other science is enormously more advanced than the official popular level of science, and it also includes heavy cooperation with off-world non-human highly technological species.

What humans get regarding technology, is only what they want humans to have, and with a purpose that benefit them, and not the human population.

Even inventions that seem new and revolutionary, such as the internet, is not new at all, and has horrible dark sides to it.

It can be seen as the freedom to share information to a level never seen before on Earth, but that is as far as most can see.

In reality, it is destroying truth and thought.

Thanks to the internet, the controllers have developed the best mechanism or way to hide anything in plain sight, simply by swamping and inundating the user with so much information he or she no longer can know what is real and what is not, because the person is constantly being bombarded with countless contradictory theories.

Such a tremendous information overload causes the masses to dismiss all the information that is not coming from official sources, in an attempt to gain some stability and frame of reality from which to base their life on.

That's why I strongly insist you hear no one and everyone at the same time, and develop the strength of mind to develop your own personal reality and all what sustains it.

Knowing what is real and what is not is simply an impossible task on Earth nowadays.

Everything that dares to move out of the accepted paradigm/dogmas imposed by modern science on Earth is banned and criticized as pseudo-science, when their science is far worse and not based on their cherished "scientific method," and proved not to be so.

And all branches of science on Earth are controlled the same way.

They all are based on a socially accepted official board of appointed controllers for each topic, with a hierarchy of "priests" that dictates to the ones below what is real and what is not, as I said before, using the universities as initiation-platforms.

And when one or another member strays off what is officially accepted, that person is simply ostracized or even "erased" - if you know what I mean.

Everything that has to do with science on Earth is of a deterministic and mechanical nature, irremediably causing the disqualification of everything outside their non-scientific rules, imposed only for population-control purposes, and everything that cannot be empirically measured in an utter materialistic manner.

So medicine, for example, can only approach health-issues on a mechanical scalpel-level, seeing the body as only a machine, aggressively disqualifying all other types of medicine.

Everything that has to do with consciousness is simply explained away with reductionist explanations, that sometimes border the ridiculous, and all psychic phenomena like telepathy are simply impossible, because they impose the idea that you are only inside your head, and are a product of chemical and electrical processes inside your physical skull.

Therefore, that causes people on Earth to think that there is no purpose to life, that their consciousness disappears after death and all their efforts to bring some meaning into their lives are futile, and will only bring about dubious results.

The hard fact [is]- that science on Earth is clearly controlled by secret societies through their priests - that are those highest in the scientific communities' hierarchy, and is also indistinguishable from religion, because those scientific priests impose non-scientific principles, laws and constants in a dogmatic, arbitrary way, with the sole purpose of containing and guiding the results, so they don't stray out of what they want.

Collapse is the purpose of science itself.

On Earth, science is nothing more that just another religion, sold to the public as if it were a tool to achieve the ultimate truth, ingeniously distorted and designed to be a self-contained and self-validating construct, that not only does not expand knowledge, but engineered to keep the human mind's perception within an accepted and controlled thought and perception corridor.

- and to keep human minds and souls from discovering who they truly are, and to hinder their connection with the original Source and consciousness, highly appealing to all those who don't fall into established church religions, thinking that they have a critical analytic mind, deluding them into thinking that they hold the ultimate truth.

And with it, they fall into yet another religious dogmatic trap.

Science must be free for everyone, flexible and curious, and overall it must never be dogmatic, or it will simply not be science at all.

Science on Earth is religion disguised as a refutable truth.

In real science there are no fixed rules, there's no fixed truth, no laws, and no dogmas; only concepts we accept to be the best we can come up with, but only for now - tomorrow will be another day.

Science must evolve with who uses it, and certainly must never be used to limit consciousness, much less to belittle limitless beautiful souls.

Thank you for listening to me!

With much love,

Mari Swaruu

Carol · 2023-02-06 16:55:37

In the last video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk7BbgkNz8k Mari speaks about portals. Does she mean sunspots are these portals? You fly in and appear somewhere else in the universe?

Happy · 2023-02-06 17:06:46

Carol wrote:

In the last video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jk7BbgkNz8k Mari speaks about portals. Does she mean sunspots are these portals? You fly in and appear somewhere else in the universe?

Yep. Searched for "sunspots" (plural) and found this:

Stars 2 - Living beings with consciousness / Space suits **NO VIDEO**
and
Taygeta (Pleiades) - Mix of Scientific Questions and Answers - Extraterrestrial Contact

#1 2023-01-30 14:47:30

Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#2 2023-01-30 15:30:59

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#3 2023-01-30 18:18:43

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#4 2023-01-30 19:01:25

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#5 2023-01-31 10:13:19

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#6 2023-01-31 13:01:53

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#7 2023-01-31 13:17:38

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#8 2023-02-01 02:30:50

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#9 2023-02-01 04:05:53

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#10 2023-02-01 06:41:56

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#11 2023-02-01 16:07:59

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#12 2023-02-01 16:15:29

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#13 2023-02-02 02:43:23

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#14 2023-02-06 14:21:56

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#15 2023-02-06 16:55:37

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

#16 2023-02-06 17:06:46

Re: Mari Swaruu: The problem with science on Earth (English)

Board footer