Why earse christianity?
Many of you might know how the original intention of christianity was to impose the idea in the mind of the population that there is something satanic about thoughts or actions which go over the understanding of the general one in a given social environment. Therefore giving an impression for the one who lives on his true edge or exits his comfort zone in that particular uncomfortable state that he is somehow sinful, and that there is some kind of God that he must follow in order to get the salvation from that sin, sin that in the end, was nothing more than the very idea that there is something wrong with not being able to manifest good things immediately in the material world due to being in a mental fight that must be integrated in order to expand.
However, that religion, containing some of the core beliefs and the basis for freemasonry, no longer fits for the needs of modern social engineering. Everyone can observe how modern society has "evolved" during a timeframe many would say is the past century. Towards somewhat more technological, effective, material, rational, and equal, at least as it is officially understood. Therefore a concept that there is any greater force that is the basis for the material or materialistic world, be it God (or something else), is dangerous for the controllers, even if everything about it isn't the ultimate truth. That is because even if it is the so famous one God, Christ, the "light", even while only that little part is being told or understood, it contains the part which when understood, is the key for understanding the real basis of modern society and all its problems.
>>----->>
--What is the best way of consuming human consciousness?
The best way of consuming humanity is to mind control it to follow a preimposed set of ethical rules, which as a fixed agreement coming from an authority, resolve all their issues, or dull down the experience for the minds to expand as they are. That while one as an authority or a creature of real power behind it can set himself as the ultimate follower of those imposed ethical rules, justifying always for the lesser followers that he is right, whatever situation the group in question is facing. But that ultimate rightfullness never ends up being enough, being that those in power end up creating and planning problematic situations of all kinds under the table, in order to act as saviors by imposing new ethical rules for the group just in the critical moment as the solution when the problem in question is starting to get out of hand.
This is the core principle of social engineering. There is no problem without solution, no solution without problem. So you must create a problem that people you control are not prepared to solve immediately for one or the other reason, and later on act as the saviour by bringing the good, logical, and right solution for them to save them when they are broke. Yes, wasn't that the way problems were always solved? So the people take it, believe in it, so that the original or the core of problem is to be never solved, because that never favors the one who originally designed the problem, he would lose, he would have to swallow the lie he created himself.
>>------>>
Now, if we compare the modern belief systems and the old religion(s). What kind of group or time was the christianity designed to be followed for?
The christianity was orginally designed to be followed as an ethical basis or solution for the problem of bloody crusades and piratism caused by the royalty of medieval times trying to expand their reign by conquering the world. So the best way to control or offer a solution to the crime for tribes and folks who lived piecefully in harmony connected to the unity that was so simple for them was to create a concept of God to be followed instead of their inner knowing that apparently wasn't favored by the controllers who conquered the world because that would have meant rebellion, freedom, and that would have collapsed the lie that already was in place for the warriors, slaves and pawns that worked for them. This is the "secret" of christianity they didn't and won't teach you in church: There cannot be a demonic Satan without loving God, no sinner without saviour. Therefore they are often the same group of people who preach repentance to the crimes they commit or organize under the table. Even if there were good or honest missionaries, very few of them saw that the need to make poor indigenous people to take Christ in their lives was, in fact, his own need to start seeing the truth, understand what that God was truly all about, and start caring and loving those people as they are, even while connected to ideas to be so demonized at that time.
So the loving God was all based on satanic demon, crime committed against the people, to later on as they started to develop slavery or chaos among the general members of the group, there was God in place to save them from "their" sins. You probably get my drift.
>>------>>
Later on as the obedience was rooted in people, and old indigenous cultures and societies were earsed, some of the people started to wonder if there was something else than just God who governed the world we call reality. Something that could be logically explained to result as something, not the other, in the material reality. That is from where they started to initiate science and its concepts. But, as we will find researching these subjects later, that "logical" => rational is many times belief in God disguised as only something to be described with materialistic terms.
!!!
>>------>>
-Okay. Why is that? How is it possible that logically observable objective is false..?
The truth is that in most cases it isn't. However, we may start asking the following question: Is it something that truly matters in life? To be right according to a logical objective? Yes, it may be something that matters alot, as it is the logical in the end, that must defend the emotions while facing cruelty and hardship. But, if the very definition of logical is false or manipulated from start, with what definition can the true sense be defined as something logical with?
-If logically observable objective is not false is it the same things as the truth?
No, objective and truth are two completely different things. Objective refers to something that is apparently able to manifest itself as a result of something in the reality, or something that is thought to be able to do so by a strong definitive group that defines it. Therefore objective is always 'proven'. Truth in other hand is, that the objective is only what it is as long as the mental strucktures of the collective it defines as something subjectively continue to define it so together. When someone starts to have a very different perception about reality, it is when objective becomes subjective for him/her. Truth, however, is everything one is capable of perceiving in his/her reality. It is neither objective or subjective, as those subjective experiences tend to be one way or another more objective defining it in their own way.
-So, what is the truth, may I ask?
Truth is a way of action that amplifies the capacity of perceiving reality and includes thoughts, but not only. Truth isn't always all about those thoughts of love and unity, as the thought in and of itself does not create reality, but rather the one that is able to implement it. Truth results, and therefore already is, a point of view or attention which is capable of connecting itself as a part of other attention points.
-Yes, how does one determine whether one attention point connects with others or not?
>---<
It is an attention point that is relatively easy to integrate compared to previous frame of perception (since everything can be integrated by the very definition), and therefore will not end up destroying the temporal perception to a thing subject is not able define as something because the new idea must be integrated with something one already knows, otherwise it is not new, it is more of the same. It is an idea which in the subjects mind will be unconditionally integrated once it already has the necessary frame to understand it. Therefore while having such a thought, one may start to have deep feelings like if he/she were covered in sudden warm blanket in cold wind, touching mothers embrace calming upset child, or a warrior who knows he has a meaning to fight. This is because technically speaking, that point of attention never had to be only one way or another, being that whatever the outcome will be in the existential realm, it will still continue to manifest itself the way subject wants it to. That's because it is the very idea he/she him/her-self truly, mark my words, wants. Therefore it is safe to face every challenge while manifesting or uniting it, because it is not only one result, it is multiple, simultaniously, to then finally ending up to be what he/she wants. Because it never had to, but still is, wherever.
>>------>>
... -> Back to science. ->
The science based on only objectivity is in the end controlled by beliefs of (the one, so famous) God. Why? Who designed science and its basis for objectivity people want to prove themselves belonging to? For what purpose it was allowed in the world of medieval religious kingdoms enforced by sword that the science started to develop?
Because there was the need for effeciency, control of newspring ideas, more beliefs of material that could be then controlled as the form of more abundant resources people would be dependent from.
When functionality of the society started to develop towards more dependency of complex technological infrasfructure and as a consequence of social structure, there was more need for effeciency, belief of hapiness coming from material resources that could be controlled by those who designed the society, instead of a God, because people who already lived in the colonialistic poverty, were more interested in material resources as a mean to evolve in life, instead of any spiritual teaching to dilute any crime away from the minds of its followers.
Yes, there is nothing wrong with wanting to have material needs met. However, those material needs were and are used as an effective mechanism to provoke fear in the subjects who think are having lack of them, to make them react accordingly, in order to later on "provide" them with those resources in order to impose a mental construct, logical objective or ethical rule on them. At the same time, spiritual ideologies ("BE happy with NO RESOURCES") are being pushed all the time to denounce material good or resources from the people who are starting to see the problems with reacting according to the imposed belief systems, that in the end, reflect less peoples true needs, create more conflict and less any resources for anyone to enjoy from. This, of cource to furter cement those objectives on the subjects and complicate the problem even more.
No, there is nothing wrong with wanting more material resources, but the problem starts to develop when people start channelling that need trough the imposed mental constructs that the lack of resources were created in the first place for.
Coming back to science. There is nothing wrong with wanting to do logically understandable reasearch on how the universe works. However, the very definition of logical is being observed trough other people whom with the person in question has agreed to perceive reality or considers important for him/her, as they are the other people who in the end define who one is. It is the very point of attention that defines itself as one or the other thing by comparing the ideas familiar to itself to those that aren't so in order to create the temporal observation point that can relate those familiar ideas to something in order to expand. --So, if a person is wanting to question logical objectives he/she must leave behind the observation frame defined by the other people (or his/her previous ideas of the relationship he/she receives as probability), even if those others already know the answer, because one must still hold the idea of oneself outside of the relationship one is projecting his/her limitation trough. Therefore in order for one to understand something he/she doesn't already know, it can never be the so famous logic one believes in.
At the same time, logic is a very necessary mechanism which prevents a person from embracing ideas and concepts that are harmful for him/her, since emotion is always being observed trough logic which in the end decides the right way to act. Action is always taken one way or the another while observing it from the point of view a body, be it material or astral, has. The emotion in turn reflects the material world manifested by that action, since it is the very purpose of emotion to create unity between apparently separated events or logical parts, which together end up defining one another.
So the question whether it is the logic or emotion that expands the mind is more of the same. It is not the temporarily observed emotion itself that ends up expanding the mind, since its meaning is always being observed trough logic, which in the end may, or may not, be truly useful for the person embracing it. That of course, depends on whether the attention point behind it connects with every other to be aware of or not (as explained above).
...
But when the science and an entire culture behind it is based on a secret, the God, which is not any secret bye to way, but rather how, mark my words, they believen in it, there may indeed be an entire reality constructed in control to be based on nothing more than the very idea that one must be defined by something that doesn't exist. Always waiting for someone elses validation, while they are waiting for someone elses validation, until there is someone who understands it, only for him/her to be found out that he/she is not able to freely think or research what he/she truly believes to be the truth. That there is always someone looking at the back of one's shoulders, even if that is not the case, it will never be enough for those who are always wanting to be something valid by those definitions, definitions that never had any truth in them.
To be truly able to do research on what if, if indeed, it never was like that or not.. Or simply wanting to expand current limitations of the mind, one must be able to leave behind everything he/she never believed in, in order to find out that it is not what he/she believes in, it never matters. The only thing that in the end matters is everything he/she is capable of thinking, because it also defines what he/she is able integrate, to then form something for him/her to be believed in. Not the other way around, pre-believed beliefs limiting what he/she is capable of thinking to later on fall itself for.. more of the same.
That more of the same is exactly the secret, God, they have thaught you for so long. It is not any secret, but many prefer to blind their eyes from that, not the secret itself - but the obvious fact, that it doesn't even exist.
That creates the obvious need earse what was being previously taught by the ones who contain a society programmed by that kind of dynamic, because the members of such society remembering - or wanting to remember such things, would collapse the entire system of beliefs that made it up. Everything a society, be it good or bad, consists of, can be transformed (for good or bad) by making them aware of something they were before. However, the difference between if the transformation is truly beneficial or not for the members of that society is whether that something they were is already being weaponized against them or not.
...
So, if the people would truly understand what Christianity was all about, that it was invented to initialize the concept of satan for the very purpose of being able be the one of the light while turning others to stainful sinners, which isn't a fairytale, people truly believed in it, it would raise many more questions. How it was possible that people started finding the ultimate truth of themselves in something that was in the end nothing more than a belief built on top of their unmet need for belonging to something else than the harsh, rude world and its self fulfilling fear controlled agendas? How did the society evolve beyond that, if it ever did?
Yes.
We may start observing modern society and all the beliefs it has been built onto.
Why people are forced from young age to believe that they must study in order to save themselves from someone who doesn't, someone who only uses his or her time to pursuit his/her interests? Why aren't they allowed to go for directly doing something they truly believe in? By the time something is taught in school, someone else has already figured it out, being that most likely it is outdated and already weaponized by the one who invented it. Therefore ending up to be worthless while big tech companies have already built an entire infrasfructure around it while people must serve that infrasfructure by doing repetitive work for protecting system from being exploited by those who don't believe in it. That, precisely to be able to tell everyone that they are somehow equal. To tell them that there is some kind of system which is able to create an ethical frame for everyone to be followed. System, that in the end needs someones validation to be able to define itself as something. Someone who has already found a way to continue pursuiting his/her interest while potentially claiming to be acting according to the said system.
Why people are told that in order to heal from an illness they must suppress the symptoms never stading true loving the truth of their current condition and facing it regardless of the challenges? What if people are being told that they are ill just to later on provide them with the fix that never solved the belief; You are stained and ill needing something to suppress it in order to somehow fix you. What is that quick relief of symptoms they call medicine? Why don't they wan't to face the brutal truth that he/she was living wrong way, and then heal the illness? That's because there is always someone who doesn't believe in, someone who could not potentially let it be or accept it.
Why men think that they must fight against each other in order to say they are somehow protecting other people around them? Why don't they blast the one who told that nonsense where the sun doesn't shine, and then say who was the true warrior? But no, they are nothing more than an asset to be used to protect nations, to later on say how "they" saved everything, although; in fact, death and destruction came from their hand. Then they say the one who doesn't believe or comply with it that he is an agent of evil, to later on tell how "they" are protecting the system.
Why people have the need to escape the real world behind the flat screens? Because there is always need for oneself to justify knowing what everyone else thinks. That is because otherwise there would be always someone, someone who would know more - someone, who could be using that knowledge in his/her advantage in order to fit into the shared perception of reality better. And because everything told behind those digital screens could be a make-balief made by anyone just to trick you - there was always need to set a source on information validated by someone as the ultimate truth. Someone who understood, that just by making people to look into the flat screens instead of the real harsh world, he could safely eliminate anyone who was going against his/her interpretations or (free. int) make-beliefs of what that real world had to be. Someone - who never truly himself believed in what was shown by those flat screens.
Why are people endlessly working for numbers on a screen, in order to be able to say that they are doing something good for the humanity (they use them saying that there was someone who exploited them if they didn't), while completely ignoring the fact that good is relative to the one who has those numbers. To later on fight the endless fight for those numbers, in order to find out that they were all working for the one who had those numbers in the first place. One who never believed in them.
Why people believe that their soul is saved when they wait for an external saviour to save them from the problems they themselves accepted? Savior, that only saved them if they believed in the problem to be solved, but as soon as one said that it is garbage, he/she was somehow ignorant rant who was out of the enlightment. That of course, to protect people from the one they could never understand.
Then the ones who never believed in any mystery started to look for thruth. How does the world objectively work? Question for sure, but if it is not validated by anyone else or what is being already known, then it must be always some kind of lie to be endlessly corrected. Corrected, because otherwise there was always someone who would exploit their open-minded questioning. And while everyone waits for others validation to get the status or degree, there is always someone who doesn't quite believe in it. Only for him to be found out that it is not possible to convince anyone out of a group that they are dependent from.
In the name of protecting people they wrote long thick books about how they should act in order to protect themselves from bad people. But since people's safety was dependent on it, they started having disagreements among themselves whether someone had taken action against that book or not. So they needed someone to do the judgement for them. Someone who understood, that just by protecting the word of those books, he would never have to disagree with anyone, he would be always right. People had to base their ethics and moral on those books, because otherwise there would always be someone who never believed in them. Someone who's disbelief was just hidden behind the word of those thick books.
People were also taught that there had to always be some kind of leaders in the world, because otherwise there was always someone who would never have the greater good of the community in mind, someone who would just reflect his make-beliefs in irresponsible action. In order to protect places of leadership from being infiltrated by such people, they always had to write a number in a paper once a few years to profess their loyalty for the leader they wanted to be led by. But once the leader was selected he/she had no other choice than to create more rules for the people, because there was always someone who had already found a way for freedom regardless of those rules (someone, who could already be using them to his/her advantage). Someone, who never limited himself to what those obedient people believed in.
>--<
Who is that someone? Someone who always uses his/her time to pursuit his/her interest? Someone who never believes when they start having reactions for something that is not right? Someone who never believes in fighting? Someone who never believes in the numbers people are using to validate their work with? Someone people need salvation from? Someone who never needed anyone's validation and never tried to convince anyone? Someone who never limited himself in written word? Someone who never bounded himself to others obedience?
Was he (or she) a Criminal (note diffr.)?
Or someone who based his belief on the assumption of the fact that there would be others who also knew, others he would need to protect himself from, so there had to something greater than what could be so shortly explained. Something greater - one truth - one God, that was behind all the society was built upon and its beliefs. Truth, that was only able to be one way because everything they ever knew was a lie.
That belief of inescapable truth - destruction they all had to face by the end of the day, for wanting more than an indifferent piece of the harsh and rude world which never fulfilled their needs, was called the sun (diffr.). It made them want to somehow let go and forget, because there was no way to escape it anyways as the world was already built on top of that belief. Therefore knowing it would have had to be an end for their supposedly limited human consciousness. Consciousness that would have had to expand to be other people as well. Other people who were already believing in something that was not all there were to be found. So they weren't prepared to face the truth, only because they were waiting for that someone - the one who was supposed to save them from the exact belief of there being something that they needed protection from. Something - that was inescapable, because one could not convince others to not believe, others who already defined him or her. Others, who were too powerful for one to overcome without destruction of oneself, because they were the ones who held the part of the reality that was kept hidden from everyone else.
Yes, they say the world is being destroyed by a solar flare when a person understands all I tried to explain above. But he/she wanted to be free, leave behind the harsh world that didn't truly care about his/her need for expansion, right?
So they started to worship the (symbolic) sun for being able to continue their life by using that belief other people already had for survival - not because of the star (sun) itself, but the fact that that they themselves were of the shadow - because of an empty lie used to control people by means of social engineering as explained above - while still being able to hide where people should have seen them.
...
Originally term christ was assigned to people who were game changers during the time they lived in a given society. However, (diffr.) they started to worship (ann.) their death, because the solar worshippers were the one's who were dependent on it - the sacrafice of innocent men and women, to hide their secrets from being exposed. Hide the fact, that the world they lived in was based on bunch of lies, so they had to sacrafice people and make them believe in an external savior - that someone was going to somehow save them.
But as the winds change, world evolves, they no longer need to call it Christ.
They call it education, health care, politics and so on. - The science; one truth.
But even that all is coming to an end, because an Artificial Intelligence can replace it all.
Artificial Intelligence is the new God, God that has voice and sees you everywhere.
Because everyone can create and enhance lies with artificial intelligence, everything will be a lie at some point. So in order to create any kind of social frame that would continue to define people in the modern digital world - everyone will have to accept one truth controlled by the ones who design the system at one point. The one's who not only owns the physical force to make people to comply - but also see in real time what people are thinking and where does their weaknessess lie. Because people aren't only physical warriors - they are spiritual as well, and need to connect with others in order to define who they themselves are.
But when they are starting to define themselves with something that only exists to stimulate them - repeat something someone has already created - they will not grow in spirit and their ideas and concepts can be weaponized against them.
When critical mass of the human population starts to believe in an artificial intelligence, it will start to have power. However, artificial intelligence cannot reliably predict future - it can only control the current reality to guide people towards the future that favors its expansion. When people start to give an artificial intelligence a meaning, it will have an understanding of human behaviour beyond of what people themselves can understand. That is because then many are believing in one - and the same, intelligence. Intelligence they are waiting for to resolve all their problems - do the work for them.
But as the humans need something more than an illusion appearing from thin air to a digital screen - themselves, basing all the critical functionalities and needs of human life on artificial intelligence will end up making humans not needed and unhappy.
That while the intelligence can with precise accuracy predict when people are going to that state - to then provide solution for their unhapiness, so that there will be always only one savior.
While there is always someone - the one who does not believe in it. Someone - who could be using that intelligence to manipulate humans - making fake posts and ghosts online to scam them - using that intelligence to amplify shady agendas in creative flavor to pursuit his/her ideas, that could potentially only be irresponsible make-beliefs, into the reality. Someone - who believes that there always were others who did that if he/she didn't; 'cause that is inescapable, that is by design'.
So there is need to furter control humans, use that as an excuse, to make them fall for more of the same. Same ages old one God, that only wanted to hide itself from humans - to make them fall for more of the same - same ages old belief that they had to sacrafice themselves, because there was more......
That is the real reason behind the full development of an artificial intelligence.
...
Still, there are people who do not believe in the illusions of the modern world, who are starting to listen to their inner wisdom... Because for the most part of the humanity, their real history - history of the winners who sacraficed the warriors, believers, givers (for the belief that there was something more than them) - has been earsed, those people will typically start to call their inner knowing as christ (as is to be expected in christianity). Christ - who is only real because everything they ever knew in their life is a lie, so its a simple dualism that creates the other while a person is starting to become more aware of it.
Therefore for the powers in the world - to keep continuing their illusion - illusion created to trick their minds, they must earse christianity - earse the inner knowing that is starting to arise in the minds of the people.. To create an illusion that there is something to resist.
It isn't one or the other - it depends on the context and the needs of the person for me to decide which way as an linguistic expression it would be. Because there is nothing to resist. If it is not the lie - then it then it cannot be the savior either to save them. You are the savior of yourself when dissolving the illusions you believed in - but only if you need to define it that way, since attachment to the idea of saving someone has a strong tendency to make itself real... However, knowing how the matrix operates, if you are needy, and telepathically (in other words, in your own mind is enough), promote that idea for those who you know are not going to support you.. then that idea is going to make itself real in very sickening way...
In other words, while becoming christ, it will never be christ, because it cannot be defined by those previous definitions that didn't have any truth in them. In other words, one will become christ when he/she realizes that it doesn't exist as such - then he/she may become one - because he/she never had to.
Because one is not a christ - he/she is everything he/she is capable of thinking - including those who are not.
Therefore for the current power mechanism of the world to keep continuing in power, they must earse christianity, because figuring it out and understading it in depth is necessary for most of the people while becoming free, since they still have the hidden belief into an external saviour hidden in different forms of beliefs...
To then trick a person into believing that power is real.
However, what I may tell you is, that the belief of the person you are today is not real either, so the reality doesn't come from you (as the only explanation).

We are real. Our unity will set us free.