One of the attributes of the channel I have greatly admired, is given pieces of information on controversial figures, and stating a baseline of what is credible, without going into what is not, of which could be perceived as a low vibrational divulgence of factors that become a gossip. I was not familiar with Meir, and I was able to glean that his initial contact was legitimate, then I was able to do my own research and have an opinion (from the lower perspective) there was a break off into certain statements that were not from his contact and moved into the realm of messianic exaltations of self. However I have seen this in very prominent respected sources like DAVID Ike, who then came full circle and reneged this, and mentioned a psychiatric break at the time that element being a piece that was misunderstood while going through process and coming to what he was seeing is we are are source.