That was shocking news regarding Aneeka. The crew must be absolutely devasted. She was matter-of-factly with her reporting and it always put a joy in my heart to hear her videos because they usually offered a fresh perspective on things.

Thank you Aneeka, for your dedication and for deep caring about the plight of humanity. You will be sorely missed, and although I did not know you, I can't help but feel I've lost a close friend.

I wanted to offer my condolences to the crew and to her friends and family, who must surely be struggling for some kind of comprehension.

SAG

Yes, thank you. I do recall the Mayan videos and how the original Mayans returned home and the cities were taken over by "pseudo-Mayans" (ex: Olmecs) who mistunderstood the teachings and thus delved into blood sacrifice rituals. There seems such a preponderence on the reliance on endless blood sacrifice ritauls in so many societies all over Earth.

I suppose my question was more geared toward the existence of Loki and Thor, and whether they are egregors (created by the human mind) or reall ETs. I agree that, like the Mayans, Viking lore, too, has possibly been twisted and miscontrued along the way. My suggestion was that, if Loki and Thor are only egregors, then the emergence of blood sacrifices would go hand in hand in Viking culture, whereas, if Loki and Thor are real ETs, then perhaps the stories of blood rituals are yet more examples of misunderstanding and mangling of original teachings.

There are websites who claim to connect with Loki and Thor. To me, I get the impression that Loki acts just as Swaruu described an egregor would act, which brought up the question as to what the true nature of Loki and Thor (and the rest of merry gang). It seems Loki is ready to make a reappaearance on Earth, if people "focus hard enough" to bring him back. Is that not the very description of what an egregor might say? "Place your focus on me and make me real and I shall come down to Earth and bless you with my presence once again." That sort of thing.

Thank you
SAG

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC021: Twelve Thousand Years or Twelve Hundred Thousand Years?
This has been mentioned a few times in the videos and it's a source of confusion. Is it twelve thousand (12,000) years, or twelve hundred thousand (1,200,000, or 1,2 million) years? Swaruu and Gosia have mentioned both numbers several times. This refers to the length of time that the Taygetans were absent from Earth. There is a large difference between 12,000 years and 1,200,000 years, and it requires clarification if possible as which is the valid number.

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC018: Place Names
What about names of places and names of cities. How organic is the naming of towns and cities and locations on Earth? Is it common on Taygetan planets to have two different locations which carry the same name? Ex: State of Washington, and Washington, DC. Or Vancouver, Washington (USA) and Vancouver, British Columbia (Canada), etc., etc.

How often does it happen that names are pre-assigned by the cabal for occult reasons, for programming purposes? Or perhaps two places carry the same name to obfuscaate the history of one of those places?

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC16: Adam's Apple

Swaruu has mentioned that males are inherently female when conceived, which explains the male nipples, but what about oddities like the Adam's Apple. Any thoughts on how this originated, and what purpose it serves in the male? Is it some kind of reservoir, or frequency modifier for the vocals? Is the Adam's Apple common in males across other races?

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC14: Do Zombies Affect Humanity's Collective Consciousness?

This is more of a theoretical question. If the cabal were to somehow succeed in prompting souls to exit their human hosts, that leaves zombie bodies remaining on Earth, but do those zombies continue to be connected to, or have some influence over the collective consciousness of humanity on Earth? For example, I assume ants also have a collective consciousness, and yet, an ant colony is made up of 99.9% worker drones. Do the drones still participate, or have influence on the collective consciousness of the ants, or is it just the queens that have a say in guiding the colony?

If all the souls leave human bodies, what happens to the collective consciousness of humanity? From the point of view of the cabal, soes it become more difficult to guide humanity, or easier, or is it not pertinent?

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC12: The Origin Of Ideas

Where do ideas originate? Where does creativity come from? It happens occasionally that two inventors will dream up the same idea at the same time, or two songwriters will write basically the same song. Is this because they are being fed information or are they all plugged in to the collective soul? Does humnanity have any orginal ideas, or is it all preprogrammed and pre-fed? For example, so many sci-fi movie scripts seem to echo what the Taygetans have described in detail. Where do Hollywood writers obtain their ideas from? Do they all plug into a source coming from the Taygetans?

In Hollywood, seeing as so, so many TV shows and movies have hidden cabal references years before they actually occur, who writes the scripts for these shows and movies? Is each writer assigned a set of topics and references that MUST be included in their script, or are the references added afterward by a team of cabal writers? How does the process work in order to make certain all the necessary cabal messages are proliferated to the population?

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC10: The Splitting Of The Human Brain And How It Relates To The Conscious and Subconscious -  - POSTED: Jul 10, 2022

Swaruu has discussed:
a) The intentional destruction of Tiamat, and how that has caused unresolved trauma across the universe.
b) How the human brain is split into two (as a result of the unresolved trauma).
c) The pathway of humanity is guided by the human collective consciousness.

This evokes multiple questions:
i) We often refer to the conscious and subconcious minds, and how they don't really communicate with one another. Was the human consciousness also split into two at some point, perhaps at the same time as the human brains were split? Why is there such disconnect between the conscious and subconscious. Is this an aberation? For example, do Taygetans also refer to a conscious and subconscious in their own race, and if so, are they separate? What is the consciousness and what is the subconscious from the Taygetan perspective?

I studied under a master who once confided that she had started communicating with her students by directly addressing their subconscious and answering the student questions there. She did this until she came to realize that the questions being asked by the students were completely different than what the subconscious was thinking and that the two portions were basically unaware of the other, so it became a useless task to try and supply her answers directly to the subconscious because it was like supplying answers to someone who had no idea what the question was. This implies that the complete disconnect between the conscious and subconscious should not be there and the veil that is in place is being held there artificially.

ii) Growing up, it is continually reinforced in the media how we should trust our subconscious ("Trust your gut", "Trust your intuition"), and yet every study has shown that mob rule is almost always wrong. This seems counterintuitive, because if the subconscious could really be trusted, and then, as a collective, the mob should statistically be right most of the time. Once again suggests that the subconscious is being manipulated (by the cabal), and the reason we are all urged to trust our subconscious is because the cabal is basically feeding the subconscious intentionally incorrect information. In this manner they are confident that they can lead humanity by the nose because THEY manipulate the subconscious and then they urge humanity to trust their (now deceived) subconscious. Is this a valid postulation? In other words:

-The cabal actively manipulate and decieve each person's subconscious.
-Each person is taught to trust their subconscious.
-Therefore, on a global perspective:
  ---> The human pathway is defined by the human consciousness;
  ---> The human consciousness is being guided by the human subconsciousness;
  ---> And, in turn, the human subconscious is being manipulated by the cabal.
Is this not how the cabal guides the pathway of humanity? They don't guide it directly because they cannot, so they guide it indirectly.

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC08: How Many Actual Souls Inhabit Earth?

As Swaruu has suggested, it seems there are only a limited amount of actual souls in human bodies on Earth. Much less souls than there are bodies. Did Swaruu not say once that 4 out of 5 "people" on Earth are unreal, whether they be clones, or 3D holograms, or avatars, or invaders or other. This being the case, it leads to various questions. Are the cabal themselves aware of how many human bodies contain actual souls? Can they tell? Are the cabal able to track all the unreal bodies (clones, 3D holograms, mirrors, etc., etc.,), even those that they have not created themselves, or are they lost in their tracking?

It has been suggested that one of the reasons for seeking massive depopulation is to regain control of tracking real people. Is this because there are too many artificial bodies that are NOT of cabal origin walking around?

Swaruu also stated that ALL the cabal and their secondary charges could fit inside a stadium, which would bring their total to around 50,000. These sound like miniscule numbers compared to Earth's human population, but if there are really only a very slim percentage of actual souls inhabiting these human bodies, then, the relative size of the cabal starts to become much more comparatively balanced compared to actual souls. Any clarification would be appreciated.

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC06: Is Magic A Real Thing?

This is just a general question. Is magic a real thing, or is magic simply technology unexplained? We often hear of the magical realms. We also hear of the inhabitants of Inner Earth (not Middle Earth), who have eschewed technology in favor of keeping magic, because magic and technology are basically at odds with one another (the premise being you can't have both at the same time). Arthur C Clarke said any high technology seems like magic, and that's fine, but set aside high technology for a moment. The simple question is, is there such a thing as magic? Can there be magic at the very extreme of the spectrum and high technology as well? At some point the two would become almost indistinguishable, but does magic itself really exist?

Why do "white magic" spells and "black magic" spells work? Is what we refer to as magic, the same as what the magical realms use, or is this just badly misnamed?

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC04: Large Tree Species
Swarru once addressed the topic of a large species of tree, of which there are still petrified remains. Were these trees a unique species, or was the entire planet ever covered with large vegetation of all kinds? Large tomatoes, large shrubs, large grasses, etc., etc. If so, does it imply that large animals also existed? It would seem odd that there would only be that one single species of tree while the rest of the planet were limited in size.

Over the years, there have been various "Land Of The Giants" TV series and movies, where explorers end up in lands with huge flora and fauna.

If this species of tree was the only one, where did it originate from? Are there others in the universe? Why did this species on Earth die off?

Thank you

Hello Gosia,
The material that you and the Taygetan team have presented over the years is very much inspiring and educational, and it provokes further questions which may evoke interesting avenues for discussion. Thank you for making the material so easily accessible.

TOPIC02: Preferential Treament Of The Animal Kingdom
Swaruu has often commented on the concept that "animals are people", and therefore, humanity should consider not eating/harming them, otherwise they leave themselves open to being eaten too. This sounds like a viable point of view.

I am aware of three kingdoms.
Mineral Kingdom
Plant Kingdom
Animal Kingdom

From my personal perspective, all three kingdoms are equally valued, and yet, in Swaruu's defintion, the Animal Kingdom seems to be getting away with preferential treatment. In other words
1. You can step on the Mineral Kingdom, because "that's what it's there for".
2. You can eat the Plant Kingdom, because "that's what it's there for".
3. But, hands off the Animal Kingdom because it's "wrong". Why is it wrong?

Does this also imply that it's "wrong" to swat away a mosquito? For example: By simply stepping on grass, we may be crushing an ant. By simply taking a breath, we may be destroying an amoeba floating around. Are the ant and the amoeba not part of the Animal Kingdom? By this very definition, the very act of simply existing as a human is violating something in the Animal Kingdom's sphere, and is therefore "wrong". This sounds like shamed-based perception aimed at deflating humanity's sense of worth, which is the same argument that those pushing the global warming agenda use. They use the argument that humanity, by its very existence, is a scourge upon the Earth and needs to be eliminated.

In other words, where is the dividing line within the Animal Kingdom, as per the Taygetan defintion? Or is there one at all? Is it based on the size of the animal? Is it based on perceived intelligence? Is it based on spiritual development? What are the parameters that Taygetans use to define the rules of acceptable behaviour toward the Animal Kingdom?

Ex: You can kill a mosquito but you can't kill a mouse, or a lion, or a moose (because the moose is larger than the mosquito).
OR
Ex: You can kill a mongoose but you can't kill a dolphin (because the dolphin is so much more enlightened than the mongoose).

Is there a defining dividing line in the Animal Kingdom, as per the Taygetan defintion? Where do Taygetans "draw the line" in order to be able to live without guilt at simply drawing a breath (and therefore possibly  "interfering" with other life forms).

I realize these are all theoretical concepts but they do merit some kind of discussion because the manipulation of humanity has often centered around shame-based arguments meant to disempower humanity's sense of self-worth in the universe.

Thank you