Wait are you saying planets cannot be destroyed? So.... What Tiamat/Maldek didn't blow up then?

Door wrote:

Yes I have read it. And I see what Mari considers to be gravity. She speaks of a push by flow of consciousness. But here we must realize that non physical flow of gravity-consciousness cannot push on physical objects. Nor pull them as mainstream science says. Means what we still need to figure out is how this gravity flow grabs for physical matter which it can move towards so called gravitational center of the consciousness field.

So from what I understand you don't agree neither with Taygetan science nor with mainstream science. What is your own understanding about how gravity works?

Door wrote:

Jupiter wrote:

We are getting off topic so I created a new thread where we can continue this discussion --> here.

Do you mind reposting the above reply there and deleting it from this thread?

Gravity and hollow Earth are related. Because gravity squeezes everything towards the centre and so, logically, it cannot be hollow. But very dense and also hot because the pressure causes beta decay and energy stored in the matter gets released and warms up the core and causes magma to rise

According to the terrestrial science religion maybe, but the crew is speaking according to Taygetan science. As I said my Earth physics knowledge is rusty, last time I studied physics was in high school over 20 years ago. And I haven't studied in detail the technical and science stuff of the material so I don't understand it fully yet. How much of the material have you studied and have you studied the technical and science stuff of the material and do you understand it?

And also are you saying that you don't believe there are hollow caves the size of countries inside Earth?

Door wrote:

Jupiter wrote:

If you reread the quote I posted she mentions that "So, contrary to Earth science understanding, an object's mass does not create a gravity field or flow." so I don't think she would agree that two objects attract gravitationally or that the Earth attracts the ant.

But I think she offers the explanation in the same transcript I posted. I don't know if I have understood it correctly but I think it happens because of the flow of gravity pushing the objects towards each other(?).

"Mari Swaruu: An object like a star or a planet doesn't attract smaller objects to itself. Rather, those other smaller objects are pushed towards the star or planet like a leaf is pushed against a rock by the flow of water in a creek or river. We can also call gravity a direction of flow of potential energy in a very high vibrating primordial state. The exact way gravity flows in a field of potential energy will form different objects and will give them their particular attributes.
"

That is an interesting quote, thank you for that.
Now imagine two objects in space of no gravity flow that is attributed to a big celestial object like Earth.
You have only two chunks of iron at a distance of 1m and the pushing force, according to the formula, would correspond to the force an ant is attracted/attracted to Earth.

I am asking in which direction would the aether flow?
In case of Earth and an object it is simple - towards the center of Earth, correct? But now when you have same sized chunks of iron next to each other would there be two same dense flows of gravity consciousness in the opposite direction? Would not that mean that such flows would cancel out and no push would be present? Just wondering..

I haven't studied this in detail and I am not sure but I think the answer is the ether flows in the direction of the objects.

But I don't understand what the point you are trying to make is. If I am not mistaken even according to earth science two same sized chunks of iron in space just stay in place, they don't attract each other.

"The head of NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command), van Herck, admitted that the objects shot down over the United States are of extraterrestrial origin.

Intelligence services should draw conclusions on this matter, the head of NORAD said. He said that the military could not yet determine what kept the objects in the air. For this reason, they are not called balloons."

Fake ET invasion agenda..?

https://t.me/intelslava/44428

This one mass behaves very much like water in a very high vibrational state. Water from which everything that has ever existed, exists, and will ever exist, spawns from, and creating life itself.

This then leads to the concept of space. As an interstellar and intergalactic space is not a void, it´s not empty, and it is water in a very high density vibrational shape or form. Here I can even quote a biblical phrase, "from the waters above all" - the waters above.

I think you know the answer, but you just want someone else to tell you what you already know...

Door wrote:

_.haz.za._369 wrote:

I think you misunderstood this.
Whose attention? You. Conciousness. The ether.
Everything is an idea. Everything is conciousness. The "attention" creates the frequency harmonics (standing waves), which creates the particles - atoms - molecules and so on (mechanics of manifestion). There is only one universal mass of pure consciousness --> The Ether - The "source". When you are "incarnated" you have an ego/I. You're are someone specific (which is an illusion), then you are a standing wave. You die - the ego dissolves (the wave collapses), you integrate back into the unified field (ether/source). Same with everything else. Everything is conciousness. From a rock to a planet and to an entire galaxy. Some are more aware of itself than others.

Thank you for trying but I still do not get this - if no advanced life is on the planet yet then whose attention does the planet receive to have gravity and form a celestial sphere?

The attention is given by all the beings that inhabit a planet...

Door wrote:

Was a nice video, thank you Mari. I also did not expect the core to stop spinning - why would it, based on what? So good to hear Mari debunked this crazy theory.

But what I am still trying to wrap my head around is what the video said about the hypothetical situation we would be hollow. Swaruu said we would have less mass, this I get, but she said that it would be so because we would receive less consciousness attention. And she said this attention creates gravity and gravity creates matter and mass.

If I can ask someone who understands how she meant it
1. Whose attention is our planet receiving to create gravity-mass?
2. Can this attention be turned away from us?
3. If so, would our mass disappear?

Thank you for your answers