Allready brought his (Arn Allingham) work to the forum on several occasions.
Without much respons from members, and i tend to bring pieces to the foreground whenever the topic is relevant.
But the interest is pretty much non existant over here.
If it doesn't include Taygetans or Swarunians people have a deaf ear, or so it seems.
So ... yeah. I'm over it.

Remember the movie 2012 ?
Be like the monk sitting by the bell, sipping its tea.
Go about your goals to the best of your ability, but be vigilant for tidal waves on the horizon.
Becoming aware means seeing either spectrum alike, both good and bad.
Do your part and let everyone else do the same for them.
That's how i approach it. Whatever information you choose to share, the respons-ability of re-action is on the part of the beholder.
Nothing more you can do, wich draws back to the original principle of non interference.
The drama triangle of victim/perpetrator/saviour dynamics that every soul needs to roleplay in order to eventually detach from without falling in to the next trap of indifference. In a nutshell spoken , but entales a universe of myriad ways it can be experienced.

Congrats & enjoy the moment.

Are we seeing signs of part 2 ?

https://www.frontnieuws.com/gates-found … -pandemie/ (top right to change language)

Overlapping observations :

- The mentioning of 6G being rolled out in China. (link)
- Mycoplasms can be aerosolised, like before (think chemtrails)
- 'Election' periode in the USA
- WHO's soft coup (link)
- EU's continuous strive for power grab, undermining nations sovereignties.
- Digitalising ID documentation and currencies.
- Distraction from the ever growing holes undermining official narative in Gaza region ?
- Distraction from the ever growing evidence linking vaccines with excess mortality globally ?

And probably many more 'co-inciding' elements in the background...
Maybe even the "audit story" is a factor, as the end of the year is nearing.
Just a heads up post.

edit for grammar faults

Some good 5 years ago there was an interesting update presented by Adamu (pleiadian monadic entity) that connects a 'top' vampire with the illuminati and the darker bloodline families devoting their lifetimes to grand plans of world domination.
The updates (as there were 2 presented) tale about the demise of this perticular creature and the aftermath set in motion.
I was tempted to post this earlier in this topic, but didn't at that point in time for i was to much drained of energy with much needed recovery more on my focus. Anyway, seems that now is a good time to post it still, as adition to the topic.

1. The ancient red vampire is dead
2. Ancient red vampire update

Personal ponderings on the topic of vampirism has lead me to some plausible connections.
On a grander scale it revolves around the fact that life is sustained/prolonged through consuming other life in general.
A bit tough to organise linking dots as observations in to verbal sentences, but as we are acustomed in this physicality, we are bound to eat/consume for survivability. So in a way we are inherently part of this larger system in place, enslaved to our hunger.

Finding that fine line that would be defined as morally acceptable differs from one another to even on an individual basis.
Observing sustenance to the energetic level, there are all sorts of 'vampiric' tendencies involved, so to speak. A lot of literature speaks volumes about it. Chasing down these origins leads to many recognitions of the same pattern.

Yahzi mentions like at least 100 different categorisations, and i believe that she mentions this because of said patterns.
One must wonder how these conditions came to be as they are, and the branching of variants from wich it spawned.
It seems it goes back to the cradle of creation and its fragmention process, way beyond - or better yet - before physicality.

The romantisation of Bram stoker's Dracula and the connection to sexuality lies in its energetic origin, pointing towards the conceptualisation of the creative process, but in a perverted imbalance and a animalised blindness of self preservation in to extreme levels of proportion. As there is the "cycle of life" in temporal nature, as we see the energetic signatures we recognise as our system of existence like the chakra system, tree of life, and so on ; we can clearly detect deeper in to this basis of the origins.

For example that wich we determine as our physical/external organs for reproduction is also a reservoir of our lifeforce wich we tap in to and naturally alchemise. Be the pov from an energetic one or a physical one , there is no real difference, as they are all part of one interlinked whole. So the cold truth is that there is a plausible logic for real. And the deeper you dig, the more comes to light, so to speak.

Anyway, gonna leave that here.
Bon apetit ...

The very difinition of 'live' means that there can not be a preview ... because it is live, in the moment.
But i'm guessing that you are wanting to know when live sessions are being broadcasted ?
If so, best way for this to know is to keep an eye on the community tab in youtube : https://www.youtube.com/@CosmicAgency/community

I dunno, it still think its a matter of mixing definitions here, call me stubborn

What i was trying to point out was, when we use the "d", wich one are they referring to : dimensionality or density.
So if one is speaking within the context about physical bodies, then we speak in the concept realm of dimensions.
When we speak of perceptual level of reality consiousness, then we refer to the concept realm of densities.

As per explanation to the same confusion, in the density chapter :

So, my take on it is that everything tangeble physical is 3rd dimensional. From molecules to galaxies and all in between.
If it is measurable in 3 dimensions, it has by definition its 3rd dimensional existence. The common denominator of the human lives in 3rd dimension and 3rd density. An animal usually 3rd dimension and 2nd density. Plants, minerals & rocks go in 3rd dimension and 1st density. The higher the density, the less dependant it grows to physical densness.

When we as human grow in consiousness, we grow in density. That doesn't mean we now suddenly alter our physical bodies to the point we become non percievable for our fellow brothers & sisters. Just the gap in level of consiousness becomes apparant. And so the observer creates a different reality.

Therefor i believe Taygeteans and those beyond the 3rd density still posses a 3rd dimensional physical body, when we speak of them as physical. A various different kind of physiology amongst the variant other species, by all means. But these bodies still need physical space-vessels for space-travel. When 6th density is reached, it does not need physicality anymore as its 'natural' state would be a 'light'body, but still can choose to do so. That is why Yahzi Swaruu says it is rather hard for her to maintain her physical presence, or so my logic makes it sense to me. Or for other example the story of Swaruu 9 disappearing in apparant thin air ...

Anyway, bringing this all up in relation to 'holding a 5d body in stasis' remark and the whole strictness around morality rules regarding extraction, i felt the need to magnify deeper on the understanding of the definitions and interrelational mechanics of dimensions and densities. I mean, when throwing the terms "d" around, it is often not clear in wich context they use it.

If you're referring with "5d body in stasis" as d-imensionality or the pod body, the sentence doesn't make sense. A physical body is always 3d. The pictures we see of the Taygeteans and Swaruu's are representing their 3d physical bodies in the 'outer world'. The other "D" refers to Density, wich is used describe the 'inner world' of consiousness-'levels'.

It is a common mistake to mix the two terms as being the same. They are interrelated but not exactly the same.
To make a deeper understanding between the two terms,if you so wish to, i always like to point people to these 4 chapters (no 5 minute reads) :

1.Dimensions, Densities, Space and Time
2.Dimensions
3.Densities
4.Space and Time

The "Who am I" part of the ordeal is sort of imbedded in the understanding here, or at least it brings the oppertunity of a more detailed insight. When soaking a bit in this information; i think the important takeaway regarding to the various levels of Self, the important bit for you to latch on to is that wich in your personal field of the grander picture, that wich is in your "grasp" of percieving. It is in an ever perpetual state of growing-flux, but that is ok, just part of the process.

I feel the need to expand some mental gymnastics on this. The term and analogy of NPC can lead to some confusion.
Mari Swaruu has expanded just recently on it a bit aswell btw on her second channel.

It boils down to holding two (or more) perspectives again, in the sense that from a higher perspective of self wich experiences itself as multiple selves through the fractalising principle. Wich means a point of attention is 'you', being aware of that wich you actively experience "in the moment" of your framework of 3rd dimensional 'ego-identity'.

This higher self, wich is the expanded 'you', is able to hold multiple points of attention or ego-identities within its framework of "being in the moment". It does so for every possible moment a 3d ego-id 's (you) entire 'time-line' it could experience, wich for our moment-awareness contains past/present/future. This would be your 5th dimensional 'self', skipping the 4th for cutting corners sake of this post.

With multiple higher selves, up to Godhood let's say (also referred to as Logos i vaguely believe recall from readings) ; It's awareness is so much more expanded that it generates a whole bunch of 'Others' through the respectively points of attention principle that we, as a 3d ego-id, can encounter in our daily lives, for example. And than even way deeper or further up to Source...

But the point of this pretext as a contextual groundwork is that this point of ATTENTION determines at wich level of being you experience, live, so to speak. So it would make sense that if you were to be a Taygetean-Pod-Incarnator to an Earth-Avatar, the point of attention would shift your consiousness from one to the other and vice versa. From the stories here i understand that the T-Pod-Incarnator's physical body is held in a stasis state, meaning inanimate, kept alive like a sort of coma condition. Thus the consiousness can shift attention to a new earthbody with new parameters and restriction of memory, and live its life.

Then the extraction process should reverse that process, leaving the earthbody inanimate, and your consiousness shifting back to the T-Pod-body. Understandable this is why these processes are not done lightly, on a whim. There's a life-contract-mission involved and all, just like the natural process it mimics (?). But then we learned of alternative possibility with the story regarding the PK girls, one of them being swapped by a rivaling party (can't remember what they called her) as sort of an infiltrant saboteur type of operative. When she was forcebly extracted, according to the tales, the Earthbody was not rendered inanimate, yet re-possesed by the original consiousness (?). Was it a partial piggy-back ride type of deal? I'm foggy on those details.

So in terms of the dilemma mentioned above, with the points of attention in mind, it might solve the mystery here. As i think of it, the topic of step-ins (or whatever they were called) fits in this aswell. The question of the memory leads to another mindboggle, yet plausible when considering the physical attributes do not necessarely store but just translate from the consiousness capacity parameters. Just like i'm laying my thoughts out as i go, without having it scripted out beforehand ... in-spired.

So now to the NPC matter. The non player character analogy seems to deal with the presence of our perception, more so than there not being 'another' spiritsoul animating the other body. I've seen many speaking their understanding of it as if that that would be the case, soulless. Never crossed my mind in that sense, lol, cuz everyone has soul or they wouldn't exist here. The analogy is never exact of course. It's about recognising the emerging awakening in 'one-another' together with the perceptionfield of "you", as a co-creator of your reality within this matrixfield of shared reality. In this the NPC would be those that do as the matrix wants them to and reject any esotheric reality-concepts whatsoever.

Long post, i felt the urge, sorry.

Hmmmm, no need to pack for a bike ride or look for a good travel agency then.
Ok, gotcha ... moving on.

Seasoned arborist interview/pov :
https://youtu.be/Bs3o3z0G8tw?si=6o2dDvsZYh3feOzM

Short "Watch while u can" compilation, with highlight of the missing children connection :
https://youtu.be/5H0SpmIJlsU?si=SVxWSP_XszenD89X

Here is an exercise that might help strenghtening yourself along the way.
Go at it to the best of your ability, improve at your own pace.
Do the breathwork along with the movements and enjoy the fruits it yields.

https://youtu.be/UpN3AcXLSSk