Rejection of emotion is unintegration. It is unlove, it is unintelligence. Without emotion=without "why". Without purpose. A stupid machine grinding its gears...for what? Emotional intelligence is another side of intelligence. Without it, beings tend to be stupid and regressive, and their "advancement" tends to be reduced to retarded mechanistic sophistry. Without emotion, there is nothing but the "empirical", be it "physical" empiricism and/or "spiritual" empiricism.

I'm not "appropriating" anything. As a starseed with an advanced capacity for philosophical thought, I'm using that combined with my direct perspective of incarnate life on Earth to form an informed opinion.

Any organization who would impose and enforce extreme suffering for the purposes of soul expansion is more than playing with fire, and they aren't coming from a place of real advancement or emotional intelligence. Adversity is a normal part of life, and left alone, it will tend to balance out properly and create fulfillment and growth. Manufacturing/tweaking/dialing up such adversity to extreme levels is folly at best, malice at worst.

Yes, the adversity may have an effect of humbling some people and getting them to a place where they can change for the better...then maybe it continues to break them until they fall back into darkness, or darkness of a different kind. Hopelessness and despair instead of arrogance and selfishness. For others, it will cause them to double down on selfishness and hate, because that's the only major frame of reference they have.

Others yet will be "humbled" into seeking ascetic spiritual distortions that are non-emotional and mechanistic in nature. A strange type of "love" without passion or empathy.

Tormenting people into a desired mental/emotional configuration is nothing more than trauma-based mind control. Extreme behaviorism. No beings practicing that are advanced, even if they believe their ends justify the means.

"Sterile logic". In some ways, even more dangerous than unbalanced, surface-level emotionality. The latter can justify all kinds of nasty error, but the former can justify real evil.

You make some points I agree with, and some I don't. I agree with your point about "bastard specialism". It's good for people to believe in their own value, that they are each a unique, valued part of the universal whole. What is not good is the narcissism and elitism that permeates "starseed culture". People want to feel like they are "chosen" ones while others are not. The "blessed and the damned" theme of Abrahamic religions repackaged for those who consider themselves smarter than that. They even go as far as to speculate that people they see as not on their level of perceived "spirituality" don't have souls.

What I do not agree with is your devaluation of emotionality and romantic love. Yes, some people look for that sort of love for "recognition" and "valuation", and that isn't very healthy. Others have a more innocent approach and seek the giving and receiving of such love at face value, for the unique experience and the depth of interconnectedness with one other person on a level of two individuals which radiates outward to creation. I do not see that as "infantile".

What I personally see as "infantile" is the devaluation of such sentiments in a race for "spiritual supremacy". Spirituality devoid of emotion is not spirituality. There is no race to anywhere, only an endless journey. Negative, antisocial, narcissistic beings throw away sentimentality and emotionality in their pursuits of material supremacy, domination, and self-gratification. It disturbs me to see how some philosophies seem to call for the same mechanistic ruthlessness in the pursuit of spiritual power.

Except: with greater power and awareness comes greater responsibility for one's actions. Sophistry is not the same as sanity. Such beings may have grown in their "logical" computing power, much as machines can do with greater technology, but may not have grown in emotional intelligence, which is central to true spirituality. They may have even grown in "logical computing power" while remaining in a state of emotional intelligence below that of the average human...which many would say is nothing to "write home about".

Lol. Healthy independent thinking. Sub-par presentation, thus the quickness with the ol' pitchfork. I wonder if anyone could offer a legitimate challenge to what I said. I'm basically just that Sesame Street character Oscar the grouch, though. don't mind me. Just popping up from my trash now and then to give my two cents.

These are the kind of mind-games psychopaths employ. They want their victims to feel responsible for their twisted actions, as if they brought that on themselves. We are all one, yet every soul has THEIR OWN consciousness/awareness. Bad people who do bad things are NOT simply the creation/projection of their victims, as if they are some dream characters. They are individuals who are responsible for their own choices and actions. The cabal is not simply a projection of their victims, any more than a man who rapes a 4 year old girl is simply a projection created by that child. That rapist is an individual with their own self-responsibility and choices. The cabal, and this supposed federation if it exists as purported by the Taygetan disclosure, are RESPONSIBLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS. They cannot pass the buck onto their victims...or maybe they can, in some cases, if people are stupid enough to fall for self-blame and Stockholm syndrome created by insidious, twisted "spiritual" SOPHISTRY mindfuck garbage.

I am not subscribed to medium, so I did not read the entire article. What I will say is that there is some truth that idea. On one hand, establishment forces can use such information to paint "starseeds" in a bad light, automatically linking them to white supremacy and fascism. On the other hand, the same establishment inserted those very things into "starseed culture". They play both "left" and right". Before being exposed to any outside information, from a young age, I felt that I'd experienced life outside of Earth. With a belief in incarnation and life on other planets, it's simply logical. "Starseed culture", though, is something very engineered. I believe that people like Trump and Putin are part of the cabal system no matter how much disinformation I'm exposed to that claims them to be otherwise. There is an Aryan centered mythos inherent to a lot under the umbrella of "starseed culture", along with a recent push to insert far-right ideologies into spiritual communities. That much is obvious. It both potentially leads seekers towards authoritarian ideologies and gives the establishment ammunition to discredit them.

I have yet to encounter convincing proof that ANY purported ET race people claim has been in contact with humanity, real or fake, is here for the good of humanity and is not part of the cabal agenda. Perhaps I've said "too much"? I can hear the pitchforks rattling. The very idea that Earth is someone's "game", "school", "bootcamp", or whatever is inherently authoritarian, whether forces "out there" actually intend that scenario or not. Claiming that those forces are our "higher selves" doesn't change that.

The Nazi party was a puppet organization for one or more occult secret societies. Such societies would have known the truth about incarnation and ET life long before the idea of "starseeds" became a big thing among the general public. Logically, they would get out "ahead of the game" and try to steer people seeking such truths.

Supposedly he met with Taygetans. They could simply go to his house and visit him physically. They even let him play with one of their weapons, all back when the general population was even less awake, when less starseeds knew who they are, and less people were interested in ET contact. Now, they can't even communicate in video or bring their own types of communication devices or weapons to the surface at all. Logic.

Nice words.

You really have me figured out. I must have just sprouted my first pube last week because I don't fit your (and Earth society's) quota of cynicism and emotional detachment necessary to be considered an "adult". And how are those concepts of "maturity" working out for humanity? Take a look around and see. Go ahead and pat yourself on the back for your "maturity".

When people throw away heart-centered ideals and accept injustices on one hand, yet double down on the idea of "fighting" on the other, what are they actually fighting for? Bragging rights to say "look at me I'm tough"? I don't understand the value in such a mentality. I really don't.